View Full Version : The Mark of the Beast Chip Thread *Merged*
Notindarkness
March 12th, 2009, 11:13 AM
FYI,
From AntiChips and SpyChips Katherine Albrecht:
We have authored model legislation that prevents the chipping of vulnerable populations and raises the bar of consent for implanting an identification or tracking device in any person. We need your help to get this bill introduced and passed in your state.
http://www.antichips.com/legislation.htm
In the above link Click on any state to see if "The Bodily Integrity Act" or other chipping legislation has been introduced.
I can't seem to figure out how to insert an image here. Maybe someone can explain how to do that here or by PM me, thanks.
childofGOD
March 12th, 2009, 11:42 AM
Don't be so concerned with marks, chips, etc. Do read God's word, pray & praise Him, and know his return is so very close - so so close -
tlroffice
March 12th, 2009, 11:59 AM
I thought this was interesting (for those threads regarding chipping children against their will):
It raises the age of consent for chipping to 18.
Here's why:
Society recognizes that children lack the maturity to act in their own best interest when it comes to certain issues. For example, children are prohibited by law from smoking or joining the military. Being implanted with a microchip is at least as serious, and should not be undertaken by anyone who lacks the maturity to fully understand its implications from a personal, spiritual, ethical, and societal standpoint.
It prohibits a parent or guardian from making a chipping decision for a child or other dependent person.
Here's why:
In the same way that parents cannot force (or allow) their minor children to smoke or join the military, they should not be allowed to decide a chip implantation issue for them. Many people consider injecting an implant into another person's flesh without that person's full consent as violent and invasive as rape. Parental permission is not enough to allow a violating and violent act to be performed on a child. A guardian's consent is not enough to allow such an act to be performed on an incapacitated person, either
Rinji
March 12th, 2009, 03:52 PM
The two things are tied together. There is no 'escape clause'.
The mark is only conferred after the recipient performs the worship, anf those who dont worship are killed
And it was given to him to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast would even speak and cause as many as do not worship the image of the beast to be killed. And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,
(Rev 13:15-16)
The FP causes these things. Neither part is 'optional'.
I was trying to address people's fears that a baby or mentally handicapped
person would be chipped just for the sake of chipping them.
If that is the case that you must worship it and then get the mark, it could lend to something more super natural then just a chip.
More like the mark Cain recieved when he killed Abel.
Again, no chipping to worry about. Just people trying to get babies to worship the beast, which I highly doubt would happen or work.
BornAgain123
March 12th, 2009, 06:50 PM
I was trying to address people's fears that a baby or mentally handicapped
person would be chipped just for the sake of chipping them.
If that is the case that you must worship it and then get the mark, it could lend to something more super natural then just a chip.
More like the mark Cain recieved when he killed Abel.
Again, no chipping to worry about. Just people trying to get babies to worship the beast, which I highly doubt would happen or work.
Assuming the age of accountability is 7 for kids to get raptured...
Using this, by the time the mid-trib comes around, wouldn't kids, at the youngest, be 11? If so, wouldn't they be well above the age of accountability by then?
With that being said, using this logic-I would think they would be given the choice to take the mark.
PSK
March 12th, 2009, 07:02 PM
What if some won't take the mark but are physically held down to get it? Surely they will escape hell.
twisty58
March 12th, 2009, 07:37 PM
Taking the mark of the beast will be an obvious choice. You cannot be deceived into taking it. You will make a conscious decision to take it. You cannot take it accidentally. Once you have the mark, there is no going back. It is going to be a horrible time for parents IMO because of their sweet children being hungry or sick and not being able to get any help.
Faline
March 12th, 2009, 08:01 PM
Maybe it floats like a butterfly, stings like a bee.
I find it hard to believe that the MotB will be anything even remotely similar to a butterfly...
BornAgain123
March 12th, 2009, 08:06 PM
Taking the mark of the beast will be an obvious choice. You cannot be deceived into taking it. You will make a conscious decision to take it. You cannot take it accidentally. Once you have the mark, there is no going back. It is going to be a horrible time for parents IMO because of their sweet children being hungry or sick and not being able to get any help.
Doesn't one of the seals, famine, get opened during the 1st half?
Yep-gonna be a very rough time at the midpoint.
Sundial
March 12th, 2009, 08:40 PM
Personally, I am not worried about the mark or what it might turn out to be. JESUS CHRIST IS MY LORD AND SAVIOR, and when the time for the Rapture comes, I am going to be with HIM forever.
:amen
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.