The Mark of the Beast Chip Thread *Merged*

[Rapture Dave]

666 is the standard file permission code for most files on servers; a chip could use the same protocol for its data

[candlelight]

:nod

666 is 'Six Hundred Sixty Six' and not 'Six Six Six'.


Citation please.

What is his name is 'Chip'? :preach

But when written down in English it is 666 which is six hundred and sixty six. I think most are aware of that.

[Hootmon]

But when written down in English it is 666 which is six hundred and sixty six. I think most are aware of that.You may be surprised. Ive seen a lot of theories that require the NotB be 'Six Six Six' to make sense. Like the Barcode stuff...

[Hootmon]

http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q193/crinie123/Junk/chips.jpg:panic

[Hootmon]

666 is the standard file permission code for most files on servers;...Huh? What do you mean?

[Rapture Dave]

Huh? What do you mean?

Well if you've ever ran a server or used any kind of hosting service when you upload files you have to set 'permissions' which dictate how certain groups can use the files. Setting them to "read" and "write" but not "execute" for all user groups (which is the most common) will be denoted by the code 666. If a chip stores data it is possible it could follow the same protocol.

http://www.tamba2.org.uk/wordpress/FileZilla/13.gif

[Hootmon]

Well if you've ever ran a server or used any kind of hosting service when you upload files you have to set 'permissions' which dictate how certain groups can use the files. Setting them to "read" and "write" but not "execute" for all user groups (which is the most common) will be denoted by the code 666. I do a lot of Sever administration, but its all Windows now. Used to be Novell.

Im guessing that you are talking about some sort of Unix variant?

In any case... That falls inot the 'Six Six Six' category, and can be safely ignored, IMO.

[crystalm36]

Well if you've ever ran a server or used any kind of hosting service when you upload files you have to set 'permissions' which dictate how certain groups can use the files. Setting them to "read" and "write" but not "execute" for all user groups (which is the most common) will be denoted by the code 666. If a chip stores data it is possible it could follow the same protocol.

http://www.tamba2.org.uk/wordpress/FileZilla/13.gif

wow I don't know how this got past me. I used to be into building websites and I never considered the permissions. I know exactly what you are talking about. And I think this brings up a good point. The numbers, I think may indeed have a link to computers and the chip. This is just what I think tho.

[lmenningen]

I do a lot of Sever administration, but its all Windows now. Used to be Novell.

Im guessing that you are talking about some sort of Unix variant?Right. File permissions in a Unix system are nine flags, three for World, three for Group, and three for User, thusly --- --- ---. (actually there's often a 10th bit). Every file on the disk is marked with these permission bits (used to identify who can do what with this file).

Each set of three bits are Read, Write, and Execute flags. Normally a generic file might be given R and W permissions but not Execute, so the default (sometimes) file permissions look like this when you do the ls -a command: xx- xx- xx-, where the x means that capability is enabled and a dash means it is not.

Now those who know octal notation (not decimal or hex), reading the permissions 110 110 110 as a binary number, each octal digit is six (110) and would be read as 666. But a lot of files would also be 466, or 444, or 046, etc., and some would be 777 or 555.

[Trance]

Will the government say that certain properties of the chip make is so that this number needs to be on it? Will it be a sign of the One World Government?

I'm just very interested in how they will introduce it. Please post your thoughts/ideas/etc. Hope this doesn't count as a conspiracy theory. If not, what would a conspiracy theory be considered as?

Could be numbers in a bar code. To answer your 2cd question, I think it would be voluntary at first, introduced as a means to combat and fight identity theft (it will be sold as a 'personal security' measure)

Then it will go from voluntary, to mandatory.