View Full Version : The Mark of the Beast Chip Thread *Merged*
Freesia
December 21st, 2008, 12:41 AM
:scratchI do not think that the "Mark" will be just a microchip in and of itself. It will have to somehow be associated with the Anti-Christ
"He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666" (Rev. 13:16-18)."
That is also why I believe that this wont happen until after the Rapture, because no one will know who the AC is until then, and therefore you wont know your are taking his mark. I believe it will be crystal clear that the Mark you are taking identifies your allegiance to him, in more then just a national or patriotic way. It will signify a spiritual connection that signifies your decision against Christ.
I think it is also reasonable that this "marking" technology or system which controls buying or selling may already be in place prior to the "Mark". There is nothing to say that this "Mark" will be a unique new thing, other then this specific one will be unique in its label. I see no problem with what the AC does is to use the already established marking system, and apply his "name or the number of his name..."
Just my thoughts.:idunno
Well said -
I think what we are seeing now is a psychological priming to usher in the mark.
cocopea9052
December 21st, 2008, 01:43 AM
I was wondering, people are so vain it does not seem they would be willing to take a mark of any kind to the forehead, yet that is in scripture as an option.
So the other choice is to the right hand. What do you think would make a person choose the hand over the forehead if not vanity reasons?
Is the choice given for those who may have lost their arm or born without one perhaps?
And in some cultures, women must cover their faces, could that be another reason why the choice is given?
Chopin's Ghost
December 21st, 2008, 02:57 AM
I was wondering, people are so vain it does not seem they would be willing to take a mark of any kind to the forehead, yet that is in scripture as an option.
So the other choice is to the right hand. What do you think would make a person choose the hand over the forehead if not vanity reasons?
Is the choice given for those who may have lost their arm or born without one perhaps?
And in some cultures, women must cover their faces, could that be another reason why the choice is given?
I think the right hand will be the default place to put it unless the person is a parapalegic or amputee, or for some reason cannot get it on their hand, then they will get it on their forehead.
BLESSED BEYOND BELIEF
December 21st, 2008, 06:21 AM
The Bible does not say this either. It says the Mark will be for buying and selling, not anything religious.
The Bible doesn't say it's a religious mark. It says it is for buying and selling.
However strongly we may believe in pre-trib, it is still not wise to stake one's eternity on it.
:thumb:thumb
Aneriz
December 21st, 2008, 09:05 PM
I was wondering, people are so vain it does not seem they would be willing to take a mark of any kind to the forehead, yet that is in scripture as an option.
So the other choice is to the right hand. What do you think would make a person choose the hand over the forehead if not vanity reasons?
Is the choice given for those who may have lost their arm or born without one perhaps?
And in some cultures, women must cover their faces, could that be another reason why the choice is given?
I disagree with this. Look at our youth, did you ever think that young ladies covered in tatooes would be fashionable? Vanity is a slave to fashion.
What seems to make sense is that both of this body locations are easily accessible for security checks.
cocopea9052
December 22nd, 2008, 12:03 AM
I disagree with this. Look at our youth, did you ever think that young ladies covered in tatooes would be fashionable? Vanity is a slave to fashion.
What seems to make sense is that both of this body locations are easily accessible for security checks.
Hum, yes that is true about the youngsters. The forehead just seems so out there though, even for tattoos. But I would imagine they would turn it into something cool or the latest fad.
What are your (anyone) thoughts on the #666? I can't imagine that is actually what will be placed on the forehead or hand. What can we conclude from scripture on this? Is 666 the literal mark?
Thanks in advance yawl!
Ozgirl
December 22nd, 2008, 12:20 AM
Out there is what they look for. But I agree that is would be for security and ease of checking purposes. I think the forhead would be the place of choice for the fanatics who want to demonstrate their devotion.
Caver
December 22nd, 2008, 03:55 AM
Several years ago one of the "chip" manufacturers did some research on where, on the human body, would be the best location for the chip. Consideration was accessibility, right skin temp, right electrical current in the body, ease of scan/transmission and a few other things.
And guesses on the results of the study?:idunno
Back of the hand or forehead. :shocked
Voice
December 22nd, 2008, 05:30 AM
Just a little bit of information for those who STILL do not believe that the time is NOW. Go to the section on the attached that deals with the Mark of the Beast SPOOF website. It will give you a list of the power players involved in making all this happen ( all except CBN: they are a watchdog).
http://www.av1611.org/666/
Also, a recent 60 Minute program featured technology that allowed a person to control a computer by brainwave harness. This technology will be the security system to keep ANYONE from stealing your chip and using it. ( I.E. )Your brainwaves are as unique as a thumbprint (no two are alike).
So, no one can cut the chip out (it would be useless without the brainwave Identifier). If they cut off your head or hand, no brainwave would be attached to it, making them useless. Even if someone tried to force you to get something for you in a store and bring it to them unwillingly, you could tell the guard at the store through a thought change that you are being coerced.
Think about it, no more counterfeiting (which is the REAL cause of the US Dollars decline: 100 billion dollar industry helped by Russian Mob, Chinese Organized crime, and Terrorist Organizations) no more drug cartel (money laundering: who knows how much?) No more credit card fraud and theft
(the REAL reason that the banks are in lockdown: 10 billion annually the last I looked) No more extortion, and identity theft.
My friend, the mortgage failure was just the tip of the iceburg. This economic crisis is the catalyst to get this MARK in place. AND THEY ARE GOING TO DO IT NOW!!!
P.S. Why is the First Brigade home and still on active duty ( these are the battle hardened door to door fighters from Bagdad?
I hope you all figure this out, and keep your spiritual bags packed. God Bless!
stonewallfan
December 22nd, 2008, 05:48 AM
Several years ago one of the "chip" manufacturers did some research on where, on the human body, would be the best location for the chip. Consideration was accessibility, right skin temp, right electrical current in the body, ease of scan/transmission and a few other things.
And guesses on the results of the study?:idunno
Back of the hand or forehead. :shocked
:fear that is crazy and to think some would say that Revalation is a book of metaphors and spiritual ideas not to be taken word for word. But I still do not think the MOB is in place because just a cursory view of Revalation shows the Church being called up in Chapter 4 and then judment on the inhabitants of earth to include the MOB but I agree that this could be a precursory tool perhaps to enforce the economics of not being able to buy sell or trade without the mark. Old movies that showed the end times that may have pointed out the MOB system often showed a person having to visually check for a mark before they could purchase much like checking for papers. This definately could be controlled globaly and so much more enhanced making it easier to be enforced
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.