PDA

View Full Version : The Mark of the Beast Chip Thread *Merged*



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172

Katia_0203
February 5th, 2009, 09:37 AM
There are some people who claim we are already being chipped, and that if you have had any kind of invasive surgery then there is a good chance that you were chipped while you were under the knife.

Come on now, I think that sounds a little :tinfoil ; they can't just put some little chip in you without telling you, I'm pretty sure that would be illegal? Am I wrong? :thinking

foodisrx
February 5th, 2009, 10:35 AM
Even if it were true, it still doesn't qualify as the mark. That has to be taken voluntarily as a sign of allegience to the AC.

Suzanna
February 5th, 2009, 10:49 AM
Come on now, I think that sounds a little :tinfoil ; they can't just put some little chip in you without telling you, I'm pretty sure that would be illegal? Am I wrong? :thinking

Well of course it would be illegal, but you are only kidding yourself if you think our government doesn't do things that would mean jail time for the rest of us.

Miggy
February 5th, 2009, 10:52 AM
You're right, food! Otherwise someone could grab a Christian's hand right now and use an injector gun to insert a microchip into it, effectively making them lose their salvation. Any microchipping of people we see today is noteworthy only as a precursor of the Mark that is yet to come during the Tribulation.

foodisrx
February 5th, 2009, 11:06 AM
Just getting the rabble used to the concept.

Rockofages
February 11th, 2009, 02:22 PM
The inventor of the UPC barcode is George J. Laurer. In 1971, while Mr. Laurer was an employee with IBM, he was assigned the task "to design the best code and symbol suitable for the grocery industry". In 1973, Mr. Laurer's UPC barcode entered the world, and the rest is history.

On Mr. Laurer's web site, he has a "Questions" page, where he answers various questions about the UPC barcode. On the "Questions" page, Mr. Laurer answers the "666" question, as follows:

Question #8 - Rumor has it that the lines (left, middle, and right) that protrude below the U.P.C. code are the numbers 6,6,6... and that this is the international money code. I typed a code with all sixes and this seems to be true. At least they all resemble sixes. What's up with that?

Answer- Yes, they do RESEMBLE the code for a six. An even parity 6 is:

1 module wide black bar 1 module wide white space 1 module wide black bar 4 module wide white space

There is nothing sinister about this nor does it have anything to do with the Bible's "mark of the beast" (The New Testament, The Revelation, Chapter 13, paragraph 18). It is simply a coincidence like the fact that my first, middle, and last name all have 6 letters. There is no connection with an international money code either. (From website)http://www.av1611.org/666/images/barcode2a.gif

Logicon
February 11th, 2009, 02:33 PM
The government patented this technology long ago and they are just waiting to be able to implement it.


There have been other methods to permanently identify humans. During the holocaust, the Nazis tattooed the arms of Jews with a unique identifying number. On an episode of the "X-FILES," a fictional television program on the FOX television network, a human was abducted by aliens who conducted experiments on the abductee. In order to permanently tag the abductee, the aliens etched a unique bar code onto one of the abductee's teeth. Neither of these methods is practical for marking humans for electronic sale transaction purposes. First, social conscience dictates that any permanent marking of humans not be conspicuous, such as a visible numbering on an arm like the holocaust victims. Second, the bar code must be long enough, large enough, and accessible enough to make the transaction efficient. Thus bar codes on teeth would not be practical because of the limited size of the teeth and the embarrassment caused by sales personnel placing scanning equipment in a customer's mouth.

Patent No. 5,878,155
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5,878,155.PN.&OS=PN/5,878,155&RS=PN/5,878,155

Rockofages
February 11th, 2009, 02:39 PM
The barcode does not necessarily have to be the mark of the beast but shows how deceptively things can creep in. That to it is used in products involved in "buying and selling" Praise the Lord for Bible. God only wants us to know the generation we are in with all these signs.

I have also heard that the best possible place to plant a RFID chip is in the right hand or forehead. I am not sure on this one.

Sari
February 11th, 2009, 05:53 PM
I have heard of these bar codes to be 666 for years. :heh

Daughter
February 11th, 2009, 06:17 PM
There really aren't. You just have to take a really close look at it. Someone came up with the idea there are three sixes permanently embedded in there but there never has been. It's just another urban myth. :thumb

http://www.virtualsalt.com/barcode.htm