Over 300 offenses Obama commits against America

[StarofDavid]

"In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." --Thomas Jefferson

Election Day 2 November 2010, My 60th birthday, I hope I get the gift we all want :hehee

[OnceWasLost]

Perhaps someone has asked this but a shorter list would be what has he done right? The other option needs daily hourly minute by minute updates.:tsk

[ron4Jesus]

He is good with mass hope-nosis also


http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo157/prtyblueyz7661966/hopenosis.gif

[ron4Jesus]

Perhaps someone has asked this but a shorter list would be what has he done right? The other option needs daily hourly minute by minute updates.:tsk

I don't think there is such a list at all. Now if he resigned from office of the Presidency then that would be the one right thing to do.

http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo157/prtyblueyz7661966/Obama17.jpg

[Buzzardhut]

This is a good thread to share with Canadians and all liberal Europeans :nod

[TimothyK]

If you overstate your case, you sound biased and people won't take your view seriously. It's better to approach these issues with a balanced view, taking into account all the relevant facts, considering and addressing counter-arguments.

I think it's also important to distinguish those things that Obama has done that contradict your political point of view from those things that violate absolute moral truths. I think you can make a case against Obama on moral grounds alone, independent of one's ideas on how a country should be run, and that kind of argument is far more persuasive (or at least it should be) to Christians who already believe in objective morality.

Alright. It's obvious we've sufficiently established the man is morally incompatible with Christianity. Adding to that, most Christians in America don't agree with the man politically. That helps things along then, wouldn't you agree? If he's morally bankrupt, he isn't going to have sound political leanings. Is it overstating and/or biased to say most Christians in America can't stand the man because of his gross morality in addition to his marxist/socialist politics?

:hat

[laney]

I think he also declared the month of June gay pride month for the homosexuals ?

[rreighe]

This is an open letter from Canada to the United States entitled What Have You Done ?
http://frontpagemag.com/2010/04/05/what-have-you-done/

very sobering.... indeed... :sad


great vocabulary usage also.

[yogi3939]

Not many think as you guys do about how bad Obama is.

Most don't think that highly of him.


http://www.casadice.com/signs/images/outside_sign148.jpg

[The Liquidator]

A christian cannot "overstate" their reasoning for being against practices in their country like abortion/infanticide, homosexuality. If we elect leaders that have aligned themselves against the word of God, then that is exactly where they will lead the entire nation - away from God. The content of moral character has been sadly and criminally underestimated by many people when they go to the polls and vote in America. Many vote solely on a candidates economic views, or stance on one particular issue, like healthcare.

I believe it is wise to try and do what God told Samuel when David was to be annointed. Do not look on his outer appearance. 1 Sam 16 - Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.

The Lord looks at the heart, but only He can do that. However, we can know a tree by its fruit.


Oh yes he has, in Illinois they did some interviews with nurses that explained if the baby survived abortion they were instructed to take the live baby to an area to die. I saw this somewhere and my mouth dropped. Not sure if it was on TV or on the net. Here is an article and it's Christ Hospital where this was happening.


(http://www.kkla.com/11580882/)[/URL]

In the view of the pro-abortionists, the baby is not a valuable human being until it is carried to term and delivered, so as far as they are concerned, these abortion survivors are not yet valuable human beings. Hence, this is not infanticide in their view. Sick, twisted reasoning, and also profoundly illogical.


You are wrong. Late term abortion is killing the baby as it is exiting the birth canal. Ummmm, that is a born baby, that would be infanticide.



Here is the link where you can actually listen to this audio:
[url]http://www.jillstanek.com/aborted-alive/links-to-barack.html (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anieuWFWe8s)

Research the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, and why Illinois is one of the few states not to ratify this act. It is due to Obama!!!!

You need to do some research on early forced births in Illinois and Obama. Obama thought it was perfectly fine to force a baby to be born at 6 months into the pregnancy and then allow the baby to die in a trash can. This nurse Stanek that found this baby still alive testified in front of him, and he showed zero emotion.

I thought late-term abortion and partial birth abortion were different things. In any case, if you're going to apply some arbitrary criteria to determine who is a valuable human being and who is not, such as physical location (inside or outside the womb), then why not arbitrarily say the baby is not a valuable human being until it has completely cleared the birth canal? I guess that's what they've done with partial birth abortion. Sickening.

The accusation that Obama promotes infanticide turns out to be true, as long as you clarify that you consider a partially born baby to be an infant.


Go ask your 'christian' friends ...

Come one now, be charitable. If you go putting quotes around the word Christian every time a Christian expresses a viewpoint that is inconsistent with a biblically-based worldview, then, well, you'll be using a lot of quotes! Holding contradictory ideas in the same mind does not disqualify one for salvation.