PDA

View Full Version : Survey: Male gay teachers abuse most


felixthecat
October 12th, 2007, 02:02 PM
Survey: Male gay teachers abuse most

October 11, 2007

A survey of news stories in seven English-speaking countries conducted by the Family Research Institute shows that incidents of teacher-pupil sex are most often perpetrated by male homosexual teachers. Overall, 43 percent of teachers who made the news for having sex with their pupils over the last 27 years were homosexual.

Homosexual teachers violated 1,925 (56 percent) of the 3,457 pupil-victims. Women were 11 percent of perpetrators, but a heterosexual female teacher was least apt to have sex with pupils, Christian Newswire reported Thursday.

Lexis-Nexis was searched from 1980 through 2006 uncovering 902 teachers who had sex with pupils. Teachers who engaged in homosexuality constituted 63 percent of perpetrators in Ireland, 62 percent in New Zealand, 60 percent in Canada, 54 percent in Scotland, 48 percent in Australia, 47 percent in England and 35 percent in the United States.

Impressive numbers, when in the U.S. it is estimated that at most 1-2% of the population or to be generous 3% of the population are homosexual.

Here's the study:

http://www.ejssb.org/6.html

Abstract:

Abstract: In news stories in English across the world for 1980-2006, 902 teachers engaged in sex with 3,457 pupils. Teachers engaging in same-sex sex constituted 63% of perpetrators in Ireland, 62% in New Zealand, 60% in Canada, 54% in Scotland, 48% in Australia, 47% in England, and 35% in the U.S.; in smaller samples, homosexuals accounted for 71% of perpetrators in mainland Europe, 26% in Africa, and 13% in Asia. Proportionately more same-sex sexual activity with pupils occurred in the West as compared to Asia and Africa.Most (54% of 810 male, 83% of 92 female) teachers violated only opposite sex pupils; 43% of perpetrators engaged in homosexuality; and 55% of victims were boys. Findings for each country or set of countries were consistent with U.S. studies based on superintendent report, principal report, self-report, and convictions indicating that a male homosexual is the most and a female heterosexual the least apt to have sex with pupils.

From the "About" page of the new journal where this study appeared:

The scientists at FRI do original scientific research and have been asked to review the work of other scientists. Everything FRI has published has passed scientific peer-review. Its articles have been cited in major legal decisions, used by Congressional researchers, and employed by various State officials in blocking gay rights legislation and administrative proposals.

...

Why EJSSB is Different

Many journals — such as those of the American Psychological and Sociological Associations — take an advocacy role regarding SS, refusing to publish papers that might be construed as ‘injuring’ the progress of the ‘gay movement.’ Others, such as Pediatrics, publish reviews of parenting by those who engage in SS, but present one side of the issue while deliberately ignoring counter-research. As a purely scholarly publication devoted to scientific investigations, the Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior will not take any editorial stance or advocacy position for or against ‘gay rights,’ the age of consent, the criminalization of SS, whether those who practice SS should be induced to change, etc. because these are all matters of public policy, law, politics, moral judgment, and/or opinion. Empirical phenomena constitute the sole academic focus of this journal. A number of our editors and reviewers are anonymous because they fear for their careers. This indicates the degree to which ‘being in scientific fashion regarding gay rights’ has become a requirement for publication. Even opening the possibility that one is not in favor of ‘gay rights’ can be a career killer. EJSSB exists to permit free, unfettered inquiry. No editorial stance regarding gay rights — pro or con — is taken in the hope that, in the long run, ‘truth will out.’

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/About/tabid/55/Default.aspx

Who is really suprised?

Males are VISUAL!

Southern Lady
October 12th, 2007, 04:57 PM
Why do I have this feeling that some gay rights group will have the opposite findings.

felixthecat
October 13th, 2007, 12:52 PM
Why do I have this feeling that some gay rights group will have the opposite findings.

I wish people would


WAKE UP!

What I posted is the politically INcorrect truth.

All you can do is point out the truth of being "gay" and it's effects on kids ... males are VISUAL. AGE is not a barrier to MOST "gay" males. Just as with heterosexual males - they too are VISUAL and many exercise self control. The diference as I see it, is that to be "gay" and pair of with a same sex partner takes alot of brainwashing of reality - to go after kids isn't that big of a step. Atleast heterosexual males that cheat or run around atleast get the gender right in who they are attracted to. I'm not saying that's okay but just pointing our how delusional the "gay" lifestyle choice is.

tlword
October 13th, 2007, 02:49 PM
When people start perverting God's laws of sexuality to start saying the "gay lifestyle choice" is "valid", it doesn't take long before the perversion is expanded to include children, animals, etc., as being "valid." I hate to say this, but I'm afraid the perversions are only going to get worse before we are taken home.

MochaMel
October 13th, 2007, 03:29 PM
^^ okay that's a bit harsh on the gay statement you said! We are to hate the sin but love the sinner. How will they ever will they be saved if we do not?

Though i do agree that child sex predators should never be let go into society... EVER AGAIN... They are sick and i don't think they can be fixed; something happened long ago to them that changed them. I would like to see them all shot as my children could be exposed to them. But again that is probably not a very biblical stand for me to take. But at least i'm honest; in \where i'm at with that. :idunno