PDA

View Full Version : Human race will 'split into two different species' - MERGED


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6

StarryEyedLad
October 24th, 2007, 11:46 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm

Last Updated: Tuesday, 17 October 2006, 08:47 GMT 09:47 UK

Human species 'may split in two'

Humanity may split into two sub-species in 100,000 years' time as predicted by HG Wells, an expert has said.
Evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry of the London School of Economics expects a genetic upper class and a dim-witted underclass to emerge.

The human race would peak in the year 3000, he said - before a decline due to dependence on technology.

People would become choosier about their sexual partners, causing humanity to divide into sub-species, he added.

The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures.

Race 'ironed out'

But in the nearer future, humans will evolve in 1,000 years into giants between 6ft and 7ft tall, he predicts, while life-spans will have extended to 120 years, Dr Curry claims.

Physical appearance, driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility, will improve, he says, while men will exhibit symmetrical facial features, look athletic, and have squarer jaws, deeper voices and bigger penises.

Women, on the other hand, will develop lighter, smooth, hairless skin, large clear eyes, pert breasts, glossy hair, and even features, he adds. Racial differences will be ironed out by interbreeding, producing a uniform race of coffee-coloured people.

However, Dr Curry warns, in 10,000 years time humans may have paid a genetic price for relying on technology.

Spoiled by gadgets designed to meet their every need, they could come to resemble domesticated animals.

Receding chins

Social skills, such as communicating and interacting with others, could be lost, along with emotions such as love, sympathy, trust and respect. People would become less able to care for others, or perform in teams.

Physically, they would start to appear more juvenile. Chins would recede, as a result of having to chew less on processed food.

There could also be health problems caused by reliance on medicine, resulting in weak immune systems. Preventing deaths would also help to preserve the genetic defects that cause cancer.

Further into the future, sexual selection - being choosy about one's partner - was likely to create more and more genetic inequality, said Dr Curry.

The logical outcome would be two sub-species, "gracile" and "robust" humans similar to the Eloi and Morlocks foretold by HG Wells in his 1895 novel The Time Machine.



Don't ya just love this? >>sarcasm<<
:ohno:doh:rolleyes:twitch

StarryEyedLad
October 24th, 2007, 11:57 PM
Here's some more if the first article didn't make you hurl.
(The article is from 2005, but still telling of what's going on in scientific circles.)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7103668/

Human evolution at the crossroads
Genetics, cybernetics complicate forecast for species

By Alan Boyle
Science editor
MSNBC
Updated: 6:00 p.m. ET May 2, 2005

Scientists are fond of running the evolutionary clock backward, using DNA analysis and the fossil record to figure out when our ancestors stood erect and split off from the rest of the primate evolutionary tree.

But the clock is running forward as well. So where are humans headed?

Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins says it's the question he's most often asked, and "a question that any prudent evolutionist will evade." But the question is being raised even more frequently as researchers study our past and contemplate our future.

Paleontologists say that anatomically modern humans may have at one time shared the Earth with as many as three other closely related types — Neanderthals, Homo erectus and the dwarf hominids whose remains were discovered last year in Indonesia.

Does evolutionary theory allow for circumstances in which "spin-off" human species could develop again?

Some think the rapid rise of genetic modification could be just such a circumstance. Others believe we could blend ourselves with machines in unprecedented ways — turning natural-born humans into an endangered species.

Present-day fact, not science fiction
Such ideas may sound like little more than science-fiction plot lines. But trend-watchers point out that we're already wrestling with real-world aspects of future human development, ranging from stem-cell research to the implantation of biocompatible computer chips. The debates are likely to become increasingly divisive once all the scientific implications sink in.

"These issues touch upon religion, upon politics, upon values," said Gregory Stock, director of the Program on Medicine, Technology and Society at the University of California at Los Angeles. "This is about our vision of the future, essentially, and we'll never completely agree about those things."

Theresa
October 24th, 2007, 11:57 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm



Don't ya just love this? >>sarcasm<<
:ohno:doh:rolleyes:twitch

I had to laugh! :lol2

BloodoftheLamb
October 25th, 2007, 01:10 AM
:thinking




:faint

Cd4u_2
October 25th, 2007, 01:12 AM
apparently, this person have not been to America yet. Some of the poorest here become the upper class.

sounds like he is still in the Jane Austen's pride and prejudice world (good breeding class ideal).

antitox
October 25th, 2007, 01:26 AM
Evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry of the London School of Economics expects a genetic upper class and a dim-witted underclass to emerge.

Hmmm, maybe these so-called "scientists" will wind up in the dim-witted class.....

The human race would peak in the year 3000, he said - before a decline due to dependence on technology.

We're already dependent on it... these people are in la-la land.

People would become choosier about their sexual partners, causing humanity to divide into sub-species, he added.

Finally, a plug for monogamy, and we go into a sub species for it? Gee, what a bad rap...

Race 'ironed out'

But in the nearer future, humans will evolve in 1,000 years into giants between 6ft and 7ft tall, he predicts, while life-spans will have extended to 120 years, Dr Curry claims.

Well, if they keep injecting hormones in meat, we'll probably all become ferocious basketball players...

Physical appearance, driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility, will improve, he says, while men will exhibit symmetrical facial features, look athletic, and have squarer jaws, deeper voices and bigger penises.

Wow. Fabio, take a back seat....

Women, on the other hand, will develop lighter, smooth, hairless skin, large clear eyes, pert breasts, glossy hair, and even features, he adds. Racial differences will be ironed out by interbreeding, producing a uniform race of coffee-coloured people.

Omigosh....she won't need makeup anymore...or even a leg razor...

Spoiled by gadgets designed to meet their every need, they could come to resemble domesticated animals.

Aww...now you went and spoiled everything...

Further into the future, sexual selection - being choosy about one's partner - was likely to create more and more genetic inequality, said Dr Curry.

See? I knew they would pull the rug out from under the whole thing. Just had to blow the monogamy thing out the window...

StarryEyedLad
October 25th, 2007, 04:19 AM
antitox: You had me in stitches!:lol2

Funny, depending on who you ask, we'll all become :super :cylon or :troll

Another thread has us crossed with animals :squirrelbait
http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=18898

And in the hands of science is where we are supposed to place the future of humanity?

NO THANKS!!!!!
I'll stick with God, thank you.

icebear
October 25th, 2007, 09:10 AM
isn't this waht Hitler was trying to acomplish?

Just A Clay Pot
October 25th, 2007, 10:46 AM
We can't let this happen!

Join me in the Geek Liberation Front!

Stand up for your right to look ugly AND to be dressed funny!

If my wife can marry a goofy-looking geek like me AND have three children without the need for tranquilizer darts, then there IS hope for the Great American Geek!

Join us today!

(slide-rule optional)

Hootmon
October 25th, 2007, 11:27 AM
The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures. I read that book.

"The Time Machine" by H.G.Wells