PDA

View Full Version : 'simple Church' -or Another Smoke Screen?


Pages : [1] 2 3

Sing4Him
January 23rd, 2008, 09:57 AM
'SIMPLE CHURCH' OR ANOTHER SMOKE SCREEN?
By Paul Proctor

NewsWithViews.com

Well, it seems the mad scientists of the church growth movement have once again emerged from the laboratory of the living dead with yet another chia pet project for the jaded masses. The latest concoction they've come up with is something called "Simple Church."

Apparently, after a decade or so of injecting the "body of Christ" with every conceivable church growth hormone known to man, church leaders have determined that, in light of the plummeting numbers, it is now time to go cold turkey and ditch all of that junk we were sold and told we had to have to succeed in the 90s and try something new.

I wonder if any of them are offering refunds on their old books, programs, DVDs and conferences? And, what do we do with all of our Plexiglas podiums, disco balls, food courts and state of the art worship venues we went millions of dollars in debt for? Is Bono still in vogue and do we get to keep those big screens and sound systems for future concerts, videos and games or are they on the chopping block as well? Maybe they could rent them out to finance this new venture.

Is it possible that our debt-heavy economy has finally forced some of today's over-indulgent mega-churches into corporate downsizing for the sake of survival and they're just calling it "Simple Church" in an effort to save face? Or could it be that so many customers, I mean Christians, have been lost to bibles-only home churches that the Southern Baptist Convention had to make its play for that market with a few Simple Church products and services in order to snag the strays and keep them coming to the CGM trough?

Whatever the case, Lifeway Christian Resource's employee communications editor, Kelly Davis Shrout, who evidently prefers to go by the name "Kelly Davis," authored an article last year about a book her boss co-wrote with Eric Geiger on the subject of Simple Church. Lifeway is the publishing arm of the Southern Baptist Convention and Thom S. Rainer is its president and CEO. The June 5th 2006 piece titled, Rainer, Geiger Offer Simple Concept Of Discipleship In New B&H Book, began this way:


Look at Apple's iPod or Google's Web site. Consider Southwest Airlines or Papa John's Pizza. What do these successful companies have in common?
A commitment to simplicity.

Simplicity is in. Complexity is out. So contend Thom S. Rainer and Eric Geiger in their new book, Simple Church, released June 1 ['06] by B&H Publishing Group.

Funny how ecclesiastical fashions change with the seasons, isn't it? - Swinging to and fro above the brethren like the Sword of Damocles. And what should we make of churches that chase the world here and there like the paparazzi pursuing Paris Hilton to capture and copy every cute, cunning and controversial pose?

Why follow the Living Word of God when corporations we've come to love and trust like Apple, Google, Southwest Airlines and Papa John's Pizza know the way to the Promised Land of Simple Success?

The Lifeway article continued with this:


A new revolution toward simplicity has impacted how individuals respond to information. And the movement toward simplicity also affects how churches minister to their congregations, according to the authors.
Based on thorough research and 400 case studies, Rainer and Geiger provide evidence that church leaders who have designed a simple biblical process to make disciples are effectively advancing the movement of the gospel. "Simple churches are making a big impact," they write.

In light of the corporate templates already cited, one can only imagine what LifeWay's idea of "biblical" might be. Are we to assume that this puff piece Mrs. Shrout put together for her boss's book is about an effort to "make disciples" for Jesus Christ? If so, why then is our Lord never mentioned in the article?

Maybe a better question would be: Whom are they endeavoring to make disciples for? - Because what I'm seeing exalted in her comments again and again is not a Person, but a process. And, frankly, there's so much ambiguity in the piece about that 4-step process, (clarity, movement, alignment and focus) it's hard to make any real sense of it, which is ironic considering the book is about simplifying.

Moreover, when did Jesus ever commission us to design and promote a process that advances "the movement of the gospel?" - and what exactly does that phrase mean anyway?

Were we not called to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ - to simply preach and teach the Word of God - serve one another in love and humility - proclaim the good news by obediently following the Holy Spirit's leading, like the Apostle Paul - sacrificing ourselves even unto death for the cause of Christ regardless of the "impact" or "movement" we may or may not see with our envious eyes?

Mrs. Shrout goes on to write:


Rainer, president and CEO of LifeWay Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention, and Geiger, executive pastor of Christ Fellowship in Miami, offer church leaders the ethos behind designing a simple process of discipleship.
"The concept of simple church is not the latest fad or methodology," said Rainer. "It is a philosophy of ministry that causes churches to focus on those ministries that really matter." :ohno

Yes, of course - if it were just "the latest fad or methodology," it would be viewed as cheap, temporal and of little or no eternal value, wouldn't it? But instead, Mr. Rainer calls it a "philosophy."

"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." - Colossians 2:8

Wouldn't that include the rudiments of the business world?

So, what ever happened to focusing on Jesus Christ and His Word? If our focus is to instead be on "ministries that really matter," just who determines which ministries really matter, LifeWay's president and CEO or his co-author, Eric Geiger, one the "coaches" for hire at simplechurch.org, aka, Ministry Advantage?

If you go to their website you will see some of the same infamous names we've come to know and avoid over the years - like Willow Creek Association's chairman of the board, Bill Hybels and The Leadership Network's own founder and chairman, Bob Buford - both church growth kingpins who, along with others listed, heartily endorse the Simple Church concept and Ministry Advantage.

On the Ministry Advantage website you'll find such unbiblical practices and principals promoted as "personality and behavioral assessments" and how to reach your "maximum redemptive potential," not to mention those eye-catching charts and graphs over in their Rai$ing Re$ource$ section.

It should also be noted that under the subtitle "Origins and Influences," Wikipedia, the Internet encyclopedia, describes Simple Church this way:


Sociologically speaking, simple church could be seen as a subset of Emerging church[8] (although many in the simple church movement would not see themselves as part of emerging church[9]), a phenomenon rising from the conversation between Christianity and the culture and worldview of postmodernism. Many in the emerging church movement would consider simple church to be represented in expressions such as house church and unique gatherings like Church in a pub.
If Simple Church is indeed a subset of the Emerging Church, which many view as an offshoot of the church growth movement, then it only further validates the contention of some that they all come from the same unbiblical origin, and though often appearing to be unrelated, are ultimately heading in the same heretical direction.

Near the end of Mrs. Shrout's LifeWay article, she quotes Eric Geiger as saying:


"This book is not about how we as pastors make our lives easier…it's about designing a process that moves people through the stages of spiritual growth so their lives are transformed."
But, what process can men possibly design to replace the work of the Holy Spirit? And just how can a church "transform lives" by imitating Papa John's Pizza? Does the Word of God instruct us to be transformed by the principles and processes of the business world? On the contrary:



"And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God." - Romans 12:2

Whatever you might think of the Simple Church concept, this Lifeway article by Mrs. Shrout says nothing about preaching Christ crucified or feeding the Lord's sheep, but only promotes another book, program and process designed by men who are focused on Results & Relationships rather than repentance and faith in Jesus Christ.


In my opinion, what we have here is not regeneration, but only regurgitation.

"As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly." - Proverbs 26:11

http://www.newswithviews.com/PaulProctor/proctor127.htm

sojourner52
January 23rd, 2008, 10:45 AM
their "methods" make me think of scientists trying to "create" life in a lab.

the church is a work of God not man. the church is the result of a birth, not an intellectual decision.

Christ IS growing HIS church - the methods of man are like cain's offering. not what God prescribed.

true2yeshua
January 23rd, 2008, 02:07 PM
The Book of Life existed before the foundation of the world.

We that are in it have no need of man's methodologies for we are born from above.

Sing, great article! To me, this line was priceless: 'this puff piece Mrs. Shrout put together for her boss's book is about an effort to "make disciples" for Jesus Christ? If so, why then is our Lord never mentioned in the article?"

Because men's church growing methods create disciples of men not disciples of Christ! :tsk Now the realization of all the bling-bling spent still led people to depart in pursuit of the next next best thing. :ohno

PrairieGal
January 23rd, 2008, 08:46 PM
Quote from the article:

"In light of the corporate templates already cited, one can only imagine what LifeWay's idea of "biblical" might be. Are we to assume that this puff piece Mrs. Shrout put together for her boss's book is about an effort to "make disciples" for Jesus Christ? If so, why then is our Lord never mentioned in the article?

"Maybe a better question would be: Whom are they endeavoring to make disciples for? - Because what I'm seeing exalted in her comments again and again is not a Person, but a process. And, frankly, there's so much ambiguity in the piece about that 4-step process, (clarity, movement, alignment and focus) it's hard to make any real sense of it, which is ironic considering the book is about simplifying."

-------

There's a harvest going on, and that is the work we are to be about.

Acts 2:37-39 - "Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call."

Acts 4:8-12 - "Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel, If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole; Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

1 Corinthians 1:22-24 - "For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God."

I will say that the author of the article sure has a way of putting things! (The subject is nothing to laugh about, but I just get a kick out of how he says things.) Talk about descriptive:

"Well, it seems the mad scientists of the church growth movement have once again emerged from the laboratory of the living dead with yet another chia pet project for the jaded masses."

"Funny how ecclesiastical fashions change with the seasons, isn't it? - Swinging to and fro above the brethren like the Sword of Damocles."

"In my opinion, what we have here is not regeneration, but only regurgitation."

I, too, wonder if this all isn't just another ploy to deceive.

Sing4Him
January 23rd, 2008, 11:43 PM
This "Simple Church" book and method is coming to a church near you! just watch for it

(SBC especially)

mcgyver
January 24th, 2008, 08:14 AM
Although I may be the minority voice :lol2....

Speaking as a Southern Baptist, the "simple church" concept came about after a study showed what most of us knew anyway...that Christians were not being discipled or equipped for the ministry to which God has appointed us.

Now please keep in mind that the Southern Baptist "denomination" is a confederation of cooperating Baptist churches, and as such you'll find a wide range of worship styles, practices, etc. To our shame IMO, many of our churches had bought into the "purpose driven", "disco ball and light show" movement, and God's charge for His church had been overlooked.

Having come to that realization, there is currently a movement within the SBC to "get back to the basics"...discipleship, study of the Word of God, Christian fellowship, and Evangelism...without the "bells, whistles, and sirens."

Thus the "Simple Church"...in spite of what Wikipedia may say, the "simple church" concept has nothing to do with, and nothing in common with, the Emerging Church movement; which the majority of Southern Baptists recognize as a danger to the doctrinal integrity of the Bible, and which the convention has spoken out against.

Now the "Simple Church" concept may not be perfect, but at least pray for us as a denomination, and give credit for the recognition of a shortcoming and an effort to correct it...

(WOW!!! I just saw that I lost over 600 posts and 4 years of membership...go away for a while and the whole neighborhood changes :pound)

sojourner52
January 24th, 2008, 08:32 AM
mgyver (were you a fan of the tv show?)
I am also a southern baptist and I watch the things that happen to it with concern.

I am glad that there is a recognition that we need to get back to the Bible and keep Christ central!

we just hired a new pastor and everyone has been having 2nd thoughts because he seems to be forcing changes (i.e. following the patterns of larger churches) - but I think the Lord is directing and will get him - and us - on the right track.

this discussion in the SBC may help our church at least.

mcgyver
January 24th, 2008, 08:52 AM
Hey sojourner52

My screen name is the nickname that my troops gave me many years ago, kinda stuck! :)

sojourner52
January 24th, 2008, 09:15 AM
My screen name is the nickname that my troops gave me many years ago, kinda stuck!

probably a compliment! that guy could fix anything!

antsinmypants
January 24th, 2008, 09:28 AM
Here in Germany and in Switzerland (I dunno about Austria since I haven't been there yet), Simple Church = Emergent Church... plain and simple... clear as day..

We passed one such in Berlin on the former East side and I stopped and looked at the building and said 'what is this?' and we later looked them up online since they had a site.. they were emergent church.

We saw another in one of the cities in our area - same deal.
Saw a couple in and around Zürich - same thing.