Josiah
April 12th, 2008, 10:36 PM
**Sigh**
Look, I've been a Christian for about 24 years. Grew up in the church (church of Christ to be specific). I'm not a part of a church of Christ now (by that particular TITLE I mean...I'm certainly a part of The church of Christ) but growing up in it has left some nagging questions in my mind about baptism.
They hold that you MUST be baptized to be saved. Almost every other church group in the world does NOT believe that. There is some pretty hard Biblical evidence for their stance (if you understand Baptism the way they do). I just wonder if EVERYONE may be missing something.
I currently am a part of a "Baptist" church (I HATE these labels). "Baptists" by default have what I consider a WAY too lack-luster view of Baptism. They're motto is "we'll schedule it when it's convenient for the program" - I HATE HATE HAAAAAATE That!!!!!! :mad
Most "Baptists" feel that if you consider Baptism necessary for salvation you're advocating WORKS-based faith. But I think they're off base with that line of thinking. To use an analogy, let's say someone said they have a gift for you (maybe something as grand as a new HOUSE they were GIVING you or something, no strings attached) and all you have to do is drive to the next town and sign some papers. Would that be earning that gift? I say no.
But regardless, I'm weary of this lack of full confidence either way. I'm not sure where I stand on the issue. It's clear in the Bible that our faith is based on grace alone and not works (so that no one can boast). But the verses that people use to argue BOTH viewpoints have validity. One is 1 Peter 3:20-22 which FLAT OUT SAYS in vs. 21: "and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge[a] of a good conscience toward God." (The term "this water" above is talking about the water during the flood).
I just don't know what to do with this and I'm tired of having these nagging doubts every time the subject comes up or I have to teach on the subject. Why is this so difficult? I know probably about 99% of the people who respond here will say "It's NOT so difficult" and maybe something like "just hold to God's unchanging hand". I used to say the same thing before I really heard the 2 conflicting viewpoints (well, except for the "hold to God's unchanging hand" part. I hope someone shoots me if I ever say that to someone). When I refused to even hear or consider that another view may have validity and that I may be weak in my understanding, sure it was simple! I very rarely (if EVER) have heard anyone say or think the way I do...that they're just not 100% sure what the answer is on the subject. It's always galvanized to one (seemingly) unwavering side or the other.
Most subjects like that which have conflict associated with them I can just chalk up as not important enough to worry about but this is a bit different.
Any help (REAL HELP) out there?
SIDE BAR:
I KNOW (inside and out and upside down) the arguments for both sides so the typical examples or "church cliches" are not going to do any good in this discussion.
Is baptism more than just a "symbol"?
Look, I've been a Christian for about 24 years. Grew up in the church (church of Christ to be specific). I'm not a part of a church of Christ now (by that particular TITLE I mean...I'm certainly a part of The church of Christ) but growing up in it has left some nagging questions in my mind about baptism.
They hold that you MUST be baptized to be saved. Almost every other church group in the world does NOT believe that. There is some pretty hard Biblical evidence for their stance (if you understand Baptism the way they do). I just wonder if EVERYONE may be missing something.
I currently am a part of a "Baptist" church (I HATE these labels). "Baptists" by default have what I consider a WAY too lack-luster view of Baptism. They're motto is "we'll schedule it when it's convenient for the program" - I HATE HATE HAAAAAATE That!!!!!! :mad
Most "Baptists" feel that if you consider Baptism necessary for salvation you're advocating WORKS-based faith. But I think they're off base with that line of thinking. To use an analogy, let's say someone said they have a gift for you (maybe something as grand as a new HOUSE they were GIVING you or something, no strings attached) and all you have to do is drive to the next town and sign some papers. Would that be earning that gift? I say no.
But regardless, I'm weary of this lack of full confidence either way. I'm not sure where I stand on the issue. It's clear in the Bible that our faith is based on grace alone and not works (so that no one can boast). But the verses that people use to argue BOTH viewpoints have validity. One is 1 Peter 3:20-22 which FLAT OUT SAYS in vs. 21: "and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge[a] of a good conscience toward God." (The term "this water" above is talking about the water during the flood).
I just don't know what to do with this and I'm tired of having these nagging doubts every time the subject comes up or I have to teach on the subject. Why is this so difficult? I know probably about 99% of the people who respond here will say "It's NOT so difficult" and maybe something like "just hold to God's unchanging hand". I used to say the same thing before I really heard the 2 conflicting viewpoints (well, except for the "hold to God's unchanging hand" part. I hope someone shoots me if I ever say that to someone). When I refused to even hear or consider that another view may have validity and that I may be weak in my understanding, sure it was simple! I very rarely (if EVER) have heard anyone say or think the way I do...that they're just not 100% sure what the answer is on the subject. It's always galvanized to one (seemingly) unwavering side or the other.
Most subjects like that which have conflict associated with them I can just chalk up as not important enough to worry about but this is a bit different.
Any help (REAL HELP) out there?
SIDE BAR:
I KNOW (inside and out and upside down) the arguments for both sides so the typical examples or "church cliches" are not going to do any good in this discussion.
Is baptism more than just a "symbol"?