PDA

View Full Version : The Danger of Perpetual Infancy -The Need To Study Scripture


Sing4Him
May 12th, 2008, 10:04 AM
A Biblically based commentary on current issues that impact you

The Danger of Perpetual Infancy

The Need To Study Scripture

by Bob DeWaay



"Concerning him we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only of milk is not accustomed to the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil." (Hebrews 5:11-14)



Spiritual Babes

Babies are wonderful, so are baby Christians if one means those who have recently come to the faith. The author of Hebrews, however, is speaking of babes of a different variety. These "babes" are in a state of perpetual infancy. They lack the interest and ability to understand Biblical teaching of any complexity and consequently lack discernment. Geriatric spiritual babies love to be entertained and amused like their counterparts in the nursery, but balk at the notion of learning and understanding theology.

Hebrews 5:11-14 is perplexing to many modern Christians because it is not compatible with their priorities. Think about it. Why would the author of Hebrews rebuke his readers for not being able to understand the difference between the typological implications of the Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods (this topic is picked up in Hebrews 7 after the extended parenthetical section of 5:11 - 6:20)? The problem is not that they did not already understand this point of theology, it was that they could not hear it (Hebrews 5:11). The same is true today. Today many cannot have such matters explained to them either because they would not attend a church that tried, nor would they tolerate learning enough theology and hermeneutics to tackle passages such as Hebrews 5-7. Many remain babies today because they do not think growing up is worth the effort.

Hebrews 5:11 explains this condition. These Christians were "dull of hearing." The Greek word used here means ". . . no push in the hearing, slow and sluggish in mind as well as in the ears." Thomas Hewitt comments on this, ". . . his readers had become confused and limited in their minds through apathy and mental listlessness. They had become dull of hearing, which was a common Greek ethical term for a sluggish intelligence."

The word in Hebrews 5:11 translated "hard to explain" comes from the Greek word from which we get the word "hermeneutics." In Luke 24:27 Jesus "explained" Old Testament, Messianic passages to some disciples on the road to Emmaus. "Explained" here is also from hermêneuô, Greek for "to explain in words, expound." It was difficult to expound the theological point concerning the high priesthood of Jesus and how it finds its Biblical roots in that of Melchizedek because the readers were not accustomed to thinking in such terms. They were only accustomed to the "elementary principles of the oracles of God." This was not a commendation of those to whom it was addressed.

Many who fall into the category of "babe" as used in Hebrews 5 do not consider themselves such. Their lack of hermeneutical skill and willingness to study causes them to miss the point of this passage. They think that a baby Christian is one who has not preached on a street corner, given a prophecy in a meeting, received spiritual revelations and visions, testified of performing miracles, or given substantial amounts of money. Rarely do they think in terms of lacking the ability to understand theology and Biblical exegesis. Some have even suggested that the "milk" is the written Scriptures and "meat" the revelations of modern day prophets. Those who stumble so badly over the clear meaning of Hebrews 5:11-14 belie their own baby status.

The "oracles" to which the author of Hebrews refers are probably brief, easily understood sayings such as the ten commandments. As A. T. Robertson states, "Logion is a diminutive of logos, divine oracles being usually brief. . ." Hewitt says that oracle (logion), ". . . originally meant a `brief, condensed, divine saying.'" Babes never progress beyond briefly stated basics of the faith. These elementary principles are necessary, as Hebrews 6:1-3 shows, but it is wrong to consider them all that is necessary for spiritual maturity. The babe knows John 3:16, the Lord's Prayer, perhaps the 10 Commandments, and little else. He understands only the most basic summary of the Christian message and has no hunger for more. Sometimes, slogans or formulas loosely based on Scripture serve as trite answers to every question, effectively cutting off serious theological discussion.

It is not that baby Christians never go to meetings where teaching is present. It is that they seek out teachings, teachers and churches that do not require them to think about theology. Many consider "theology" to be a pejorative term. They claim that their pastor teaches more "practical" matters. These are often inspiring stories, pop psychology, motivational sayings, personal testimonies of spiritual experiences, "how to" seminars, or "touchy-feely" meetings of group encounter -anything but hermeneutically sound, theologically solid, Biblical teaching that requires the hearers to think and digest the material. This (more detailed Biblical study and exposition) is expressly what the passage under consideration (Hebrews 5:11-14) urges as necessary for maturity and discernment.



Biblical Education and Judaism

There exists in some parts of evangelical, American Christianity an anti-scholastic bias that mitigates against the sort of teaching needed for Christian maturity. It is argued that study and thinking are dangerous to one's spirituality. Those with such beliefs probably do not realize how contrary they are to those of the Jewish writers of Scripture. Certain "proof texts" are adduced to justify this addiction to ignorance. A favorite passage is Acts 4:13, "Now as they observed the confidence of Peter and John, and understood that they were uneducated and untrained men, they were marveling, and began to recognize them as having been with Jesus." Since God had done a mighty miracle in Jesus' name and those who resisted the work of God were "rulers, elders and scribes," (Acts 4:5) it is assumed that study is a hindrance and ignorance a help to the power of God in one's ministry. It is further supposed that God does not expect Christians to be well educated in theological matters.

However, this contention does not do justice to the proper interpretation of Acts 4:13 or the degree of education to which these disciples had attained. Were these men actually as ignorant as their adversaries claimed? Were they lacking knowledge of Scripture? What happened while they spent those years with Jesus?

To understand this verse, we must first understand the educational system to which the scribes (Acts 4:5) were comparing Peter and John. They were not asserting that these two apostles were ignorant of the Scripture. As Jews they were trained in the Torah (the first five books of the Bible) from their youth.

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia states under the entry for synagogue, ". . .teaching the Law to children was part of Israelite religion from the time of Moses (Dt. 6:7). The first school was the home. The first textbook was the Hebrew Bible." Going to the synagogue was an extension of this Bible training. This was not just for special students. Under the same entry it says, "In communities where numerous small synagogues may be found in proximity, men and their sons may be seen going to the house of prayer on any day." We know that there was a synagogue in Capernaum on the Sea of Galilee, where Jesus taught (Mark 1:21,22). This incident shows that synagogue teaching was a part of the life and culture of these Galilean fishermen. According to Josephus, the Jewish historian, there was also a synagogue in Tiberias which is on the Sea of Galilee.

Alfred Edersheim eloquently describes the training of Jewish children at the time of Christ's earthly ministry:

Thus, encircled by his pupils, as by a crown of glory. . ., the teacher . . . should impart to them the precious knowledge of the Law, with constant adaptation to their capacity, with unwearied patience, intense earnestness, strictness tempered by kindness, but, above all, with the highest object of their training ever in view. To keep children from all contact with vice; to train them to gentleness, even when bitterest wrong had been received; to show sin in its repulsiveness, rather than to terrify by its consequences; to train to strict truthfulness; to avoid all that might lead to disagreeable or indelicate thought; and to do all this without showing partiality, without undue severity, or laxity of discipline, with judicious increase of study and work, with careful attention to thoroughness in acquiring knowledge - all this and more constituted the ideal set before the teacher, and made his office of such high esteem in Israel." The study that occupied these students is discussed by Edersheim, "Roughly classifying the subjects of study, it was held, that, up to ten years of age, the Bible exclusively should be the text-book; from ten to fifteen, the Mishnah, or traditional law; after that age, the student should enter on those theological discussions which occupied time and attention in the higher Academies of the Rabbis." The description of Jewish education and particularly of Messiah and His family is brilliantly described by Edersheim in his classic work on pages 229 - 234 of volume I. Any who would read this description will come away with a heightened appreciation for Biblical education.
The "ignorant" Jewish fishermen of Acts 4 were better educated in Scripture and theological issues derived from it than the vast majority of modern Christians even with all our modern communication helps. What the Jewish leaders meant when they called Peter and John "uneducated and untrained men" was that they had not received special training in any of the formal rabbinical schools. This was also true of Jesus Himself (John 7:15). These schools gave training in the rabbinical traditions. The schools consisted of disciples of particular rabbis who had gained prominence and reputation in their knowledge of the Law and the traditions that surrounded it.

The Theological Dictionary Of The New Testament
states, "The talm d [Hebrew for `disciple'] is the first step towards the rabbi, who in later Judaism is the religious authority for those who are bound by traditional piety. He who would follow the Law in all things cannot do without the constant instruction and guidance of the rabbi." To study under a great rabbi was a tremendous opportunity and achievement. One great rabbi, Hillel, reportedly said, "He who does not learn is worthy of death." To enter a sort of "rabbinic guild" one must have mastered not only Torah, but also the Mishnah, Talmud, and the other rabbinical teachings and traditions. To be ordained one must have also have been a male of at least 40 years of age. No matter how well one knew the Torah, if he had no teacher, he was not considered a true "talm d"

In this setting, it is easy to understand the opinions of the rulers and scribes who were assessing Peter and John. Since these men had not been trained in any of the rabbinical schools, they were technically "uneducated." They could not be considered true disciples of Torah or Moses (see John 9:28 where the Jewish leaders claimed to be Moses' disciples, which was what rabbinic training was all about), no matter how well they knew the Scripture. Acts 4:13 ends, however, ". . .they were marveling, and began to recognize them as having been with Jesus."

They had previously encountered another similar person. Jesus was also eloquent in the Scripture, brilliant in theological debate, and powerful in the Holy Spirit, yet not trained in the rabbinical schools. These men had been trained after all - by Jesus Himself. Three intensive years of personal discipleship under Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word, can hardly be considered a poor, inadequate education! This was on top of the lifetime of studying Scripture they had received as Jewish men at home and in the synagogue.

Acts 4:13 hardly gives comfort to those who would see ignorance of Scripture and theological issues as a virtue. It also should be kept in mind that the inspired text merely reports the opinion of the "rulers and elders and scribes" (Acts 4:5) without commending it. Peter and John were "laymen" (which is in effect what was being said of them) but were in no way lacking training and preparation for the ministry to which Christ had called and commissioned them.

Later, God called Saul (who became "Paul") into His service. Paul was trained under Gamaliel I who was either the son or grandson of a great, famous rabbis, Hillel. Paul, whom God used to write much of the New Testament, was a brilliant and well educated man.

Justification for theological ignorance and satisfaction with only the most simple and basic understanding of Scripture is not to be found in the New Testament. To the Jews, being a babe in these matters when they ought to be eating strong meat was a serious rebuke, and the author of Hebrews delivered it to a Jewish readership. He obviously wanted to get their attention.



Why Biblical Education is Resisted

"But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil" (Hebrews 5:11-14). To go from being babies to being mature Christians, we need "practice." The author of the book of Hebrews shows by his own method the sort of practice he has in mind: the study and application of the "word of righteousness" (Hebrews 5:13) that causes growth in the faith. Faith in and obedience to Messiah that is rooted and grounded in His Word (Hebrews 1:1,2) leads one to the promised rest (Hebrews chapts. 3, 4 & 11). The author of Hebrews shows the pattern in his use of Scripture to correct error and encourage truth and obedience. We ought to be able to do the same, but without practice we will always need to have someone again teach us the "logion" and never progress further.

Practice at anything is hard work. Perhaps this is what causes so much resistance to the Biblical command to become students of Scripture. "Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, handling accurately the word of truth" (2Timothy 2:15). Paul also told Timothy, "Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching" (1Timothy 5:17). To become teachers as Hebrews 5:12 says we ought we must first be diligent in study, which is hard work.

The call to hard work probably will never be popular in the age of television where everything is done for us and we are passive spectators. Modern Christianity has produced a generation of spiritual consumers, many who are from the "baby boomer" generation whose wants and needs dictate which churches will be successful. This generation is repulsed by the idea of a lifetime of hard work with little recognition or immediate pay off. As consumers we want to be the center of attention and if a waiter or waitress does not attend to our needs now, we make a fuss and move on. This is sadly how many from our modern generation approach church life. We want the church administration to hire professionals to do everything for us, including teaching our children. We want to be comfortable, happy, entertained, never put upon, never made to feel guilty, and certainly never commanded to do anything that would be more work and responsibility. If the author of Hebrews was concerned that his admonitions could not be heard by his first century, Jewish audience, how much more difficult is it for twentieth century, pampered, "baby boomers"?

God's Word is changeless and we will be judged by it even if it seems incompatible with our modern priorities. We must allow God's Word to speak to us and not be content to compare ourselves with others of our own ilk. We could stay babies and never notice it or stand out because we live in a culture of babies. However, what a sad waste of a spiritual life!



Maturity and Discernment

Practice is necessary for spiritual sensibility and discernment. The type of practice referenced here is the study of Scripture and its application to the issues of life. Faith and obedience are the envisioned outcomes of this process. "Trained senses" (Hebrews 5:14) means the ability to differentiate between good and evil because of having continued in the Word of Christ (John 8:31,32) and become disciples. Many think discernment depends on a "metaphysical impression sensor" that differentiates between the feelings and sensations produced by different spiritual beings.

For example, I received a phone call from a person who announced, "I have the gift of discernment." She told a strange tale of demons, angels, human spirits, etc., that would be fit for the pages of a supermarket tabloid. The answer to various problems for individuals and churches was to use her secret, spiritual knowledge to manipulate the spirit world so that things would go God's way. This concept of discernment that makes it out to be a mystical ability to view into the unseen spirit world has many counterparts in the occult, but it is not what Hebrews 5:14 is about. The example of the author of the book of Hebrews was to use Biblical passages to correct error, warn against sin, urge to faith, and differentiate truth from falsehood. One need not enter an altered state of consciousness to exercise this type of discernment.

Thomas Hewitt comments on Hebrews 5:14 and how one gains the discernment that comes with maturity, "It is gained by the regular exercise of the spiritual faculties in the Word of God and in the doctrines of the Christian faith, for there is no easy way to spiritual maturity. From this position those of full age can discern both good and evil; they have an exact, or right, judgment in all things. When different viewpoints are placed before them they can at once distinguish the good from the evil, the right from the wrong."

The word "discern" means "to judge or distinguish between." The immature are more easily deceived. This is why people warn small children not to talk to strangers. They cannot distinguish between a person who is legitimate and one who has bad intentions. Discernment is the ability to make necessary distinctions. According to our verses in Hebrews 5, it comes from the study and application of Scripture.



Discernment and the Knowledge of Good and Evil

In the book of Genesis, the Serpent tempted Eve to partake of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, claiming that she would not die as God said but would become like God, knowing good and evil (Genesis 3:4,5). This deception was believed and the entire human race plunged into spiritual and moral darkness. The knowledge gained was not the type of knowledge of good and evil that Hebrews 5:14 urges. It was the opposite. The lie of Satan ("you shall be like God") obliterated necessary categories. Since its first reception by gullible humans, it has caused them to fail to distinguish between the most important categories. "For they exchanged the truth of God for a [lit. the] lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever" (Romans 1:25). Rather than gaining the ability to differentiate good from evil, they gained an experiential knowledge of evil from which God was shielding them. This knowledge led to creature worship, the ultimate deception. Like the Evil One, they sought to transgress the boundaries and erase the line between themselves and God.

Biblical discernment is the ability to judge between truth and error, right and wrong, good and evil. The knowledge of good and evil offered by the forbidden tree was a rebellious, experiential knowledge of evil that destroyed discernment and led to the erasure of God ordained categories. The big lie of the New Age movement is that there are no valid categories. "All is one" they say. The creation is the Creator and we are "gods," only we do not know it. They claim that all apparent categories are illusions. This is a prescription for the ultimate deception. There really, then, would be nothing to discern since good and evil are one.



Too Many Categories?

Many Christians are taken in by this thinking. Some have told me, "you have too many categories." They think categories are bad and resist study, because the more you study the more distinctions between finer points you can make. What they do not understand is that they are promoting perpetual, spiritual infancy. A baby distinguishes few categories. As a child grows, he learns to identify more categories. We consider this good progress and if it is not happening we bring the child for testing to see what is wrong.

All education and progress require discernment in the sense that identifying and typifying categories is involved. For example, the difference between a paramedic and a brain surgeon is in the number of categories that can be discerned. The one is able to see that an injury has occurred and perhaps that the brain has been affected. The other is able to deal with the workings of the human brain down to the microscopic level, distinguishing myriads of different anatomical entities and functions. All education involves identifying, understanding, naming, and working with an increasingly complex series of categories. This is why it is hard work, "exercise." If one chooses to remain an infant throughout life, then very few categories need to be understood: mommy, daddy, food, sleep, comfort, etc. are all that is needed.

In order to "discern good and evil" as Hebrews 5:14 exhorts, study and hard work that result in maturity are necessary. Many more Biblically defined categories can then be distinguished. Before the author of Hebrews began his parenthetical exhortation about infancy and maturity, he was showing his readers the difference between the Melchizedek and Aaronic priesthood and their typological ramifications concerning the high priesthood of Jesus the Messiah. He realized that these were more categories that his immature, Christian readers cared to be concerned about. Perpetual infants go so far and stop, having no hunger to learn more about the faith.

How many Christians in modern, American, Evangelical churches would attend a lecture on the typological significance of Melchizedek and Aaron with regard to the priestly ministry of our Lord? A few perhaps, but church growth experts warn against emphasizing such things. What we may not realize is that discernment is lacking because we do not care about this and numerous other Biblical issues. This is one reason why cults and charlatan preachers prosper, recruiting many of their followers from our own ranks.



Heeding the Warning

The warning of Hebrews 5:11-14 is clear. The need for maturity and discernment is evident. The Holy Spirit inspired this passage and preserved it for us (as with all other Scripture) for ". . . for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work" (2Timothy 3:16b,17). The idea that study, Biblical education, and doctrine are superfluous or even harmful is creating a generation of perpetual infants.

The author of Hebrews entreats, "let us press on to maturity" (Hebrews 6:1). Pressing on to maturity is God's answer to the problem of perpetual infancy. Hebrews 6 contains a vivid and frightening warning against apostasy. A failure to press on to maturity creates a severe danger to those who do not heed this Biblical call.

God will give grace to help us obey the Holy Spirit's call to grow up. If we respond to it, we will be equipped for the work of the ministry and can be sure that God will use us in these perilous times.

continued----

http://cicministry.org/commentary/issue15.htm

Sing4Him
May 12th, 2008, 10:07 AM
Perpetual Infancy Part 2

The Errors of Postmodernism

by Bob DeWaay



"Not that we are adequate in ourselves to consider anything as coming from ourselves, but our adequacy is from God, who also made us adequate as servants of a new covenant, not of the letter, but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." (2 Corinthians 3:5, 6)

Will Bible Study Kill You? "If you study Scripture too much you will become spiritually dead because, `The letter kills and the Spirit gives life.'" Most of use have heard this argument against Biblical scholarship. Whether based upon experience in an overly legalistic church or a sincere (but wrong) belief that 2 Corinthians 3:6 does warn that Bible study will kill one spiritually, this is a pervasive and often accepted contention. Coupled with some passages from 1Corinthians 2 that contrast the mind of man and the Spirit of God, a seemingly Biblical argument against study, using one's mind, and a scholarly approach to the Bible can be presented. Many modern Christians have bought into this thinking and by that reinforced the problem of perpetual infancy that was discussed in the last issue of CIC. Is Paul warning against careful, learned, and thoughtful study of the Scriptures?

The implication that hermeneutics, language study, careful analysis of the historical and grammatical context of Scripture, etc., cause spiritual death, is robbing a generation of modern Christians of the depth and riches of God's revealed truth. Sadly, the needed correction to this fallacy is not received by many because it involves the very process they fear will rob them of the life of the Spirit. Nevertheless, correction is in order in the hope that some will come to their senses and become willing to find out the wealth of God's truth and life they have been missing because of this misunderstanding.

There is a glaring flaw in the argument that 2 Corinthians 3:5, 6 warns against reading and understanding the Scripture. This passage itself is Scripture that must be read and "understood" in order to be given this interpretation. The claim that Paul teaches against studying the "letter" by the use of a written "letter" makes Paul (and the Holy Spirit who inspired him) self-contradictory. This would be like preaching a sermon to the congregation warning them never to listen to sermons! Who receives a letter from anyone who does not read it with the purpose of understanding it? Did God inspire the writing and transmission of His unchangeable Word only to warn us that we will die spiritually if we study it to learn its meaning?



Postmodernism in the Church

Postmodernism, influenced by eastern thinking and a flight from rationality, is inclined to belittle the possibility that one can communicate validly using written forms of communication. Books are written to argue that one cannot know the author's meaning when reading a book. Yet the writer obviously expects readers to understand his meaning and will file a lawsuit if someone badly, publicly misrepresents that meaning. The absurdity of this process seems to go unnoticed. The modern despair of meaningful communication has affected Biblical interpretation (or lack thereof).

Some evangelicals who are influenced by postmodernism have found a way out that supposedly allows them to reject Biblical interpretation based on understanding the author's intent as expressed by his words. This "out" is the Holy Spirit who inspired the text. They claim that the Holy Spirit reveals to each one a meaning of Scripture that is impervious to normal forms of language study. They see the Bible as a cryptic book, written in a code that hides its meaning from most readers. Each reader gets his own revelation directly from the Holy Spirit.

The obvious problem with this approach is that every reader would be an authority unto himself. No one could debate a cultist's interpretation of John 1:1 that claims that Jesus was not God, because the cultist may have the correct revelation of the passage's meaning. Each individual would live in a private world of personal revelation and the Bible would have as many meanings as it has readers. There would be no sure word of prophecy, authoritative preaching of the gospel, correction of error, conviction of sin (the definition of sin could never be established), or repentance.

The only remedy to the confusion caused by Biblical interpretation through personal revelation would be to have a master revelator who was better than everyone else at the process who would make the final determination of the meaning of Scripture. The Reformation doctrines of the authority of Scripture and the priesthood of believers would be replaced by a single, authoritative person if chaos were to be averted. One can guess who that might be.

To those who think that the Scriptures cannot be understood I ask, "when God wrote on stone, `You shall not steal,' what did He mean"? 2Corinthians 3 contains a clear reference to the Ten Commandments that were written on stone. Individuals are jailed for breaking laws against stealing that have existed in most societies back to the time of Moses. We consider these laws so understand-able that those who transgress them are liable for punishment. If so, why do we imagine that Paul considers the Ten Commandments incomprehensible because they were given in written form?

The presence of signs throughout the world shows a universal recognition that written language can convey important messages that can be understood (the same way by many different individuals) and obeyed if negative consequences are to be averted. To deny the ability of written language to convey changeless truth is to deny the authority of God's word. It is to create a fantasy world in the minds of people in which Scripture can mean anything to anyone and rival truth claims must remain untested because no one can know the truth.



The Cause of Spiritual Death

What then is the death of which Paul speaks in 2 Corinthians 3? Spiritual death is separation from God. To be devoid of the Holy Spirit is to be spiritually dead. A "veil" of unbelief causes people to fail to see the glory of God (2 Corinthians 3:14, 15). The book of Hebrews tells us why death came upon those who saw Moses come down from the mountain so radiant with God's glory (a reflected glory at that) that a veil was necessary. "And with whom was He angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did He swear that they should not enter His rest, but to those who were disobedient? And so we see that they were not able to enter because of unbelief" (Hebrews 3:17,18, 19).

Three key issues are mentioned about the original recipients of God's law: they sinned (verse 17), they were disobedient (verse 18) and they had unbelief (verse 19). Thus they died in the wilderness. Their deaths were not due to the reading of the Decalogue but to their sin of unbelief. The letter only kills us if we disbelieve and disobey it. It is not that it was inherently deadly or incomprehensible.

A clarification of Paul's meaning in 2 Corinthians 3:5, 6 can be found in Romans 7:9-13. Though too long to quote in its entirety here, this section of Scripture clearly says that God's commandment is holy, good and intended to bring life. The death that resulted from it was because of sin. ". . .when the commandment came, sin became alive, and I died; and this commandment, which was to result in life, proved to result in death for me; for sin, taking opportunity through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me" (Romans 7:9b-11). Death comes from sin, not from the letter of Scripture. "For we know that the Law is spiritual; but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin" (Romans 7:14). Spiritual death comes from sin and spiritual life comes when we believe God's word and turn submit our lives to Jesus the Messiah, receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit (see Acts 2:38).

In 2 Corinthians 3, the "veil" that was used by Moses to shield the people from God's glory is used as an illustration of the veil that still separates people from God even while reading the "old covenant" (2 Corinthians 3:14,15). The most basic purpose of the Scriptures is to lead us to Christ: ". . .you have known the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is inspired by God. . ." (2 Timothy 3:15b,16a). If we do not come to Christ by faith, then the Scriptures will not impart spiritual life to us even if we know and understand them.

Paul explicitly tells how the "veil" is removed and what the result is: "But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; but whenever a man turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Corinthians 3:15-17). The transforming power of the Spirit of God comes to dwell in those who turn to the Lord.

The Scripture ("letter") is not a hindrance to this. Faith in the message of Christ as revealed in all of Scripture will cause us to enter into spiritual life. The letter only kills when it is not believed and obeyed. Studying Scripture will not kill you unless you reject its Author! Those who do were already dead, they just stay in that condition, now with even more culpability.

Paul's own writing in the immediate context shows that he is not writing against reasoned study of Scripture. In 2 Corinthians 4:2 he writes, "But we have renounced the things hidden be- cause of shame, not walking in craftiness or adulterating the word of God, but by the manifestation of truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God." If the word of God was "veiled" because its words were incapable of conveying God's meaning to us, then adulterating it could do it no harm. However, if the Bible is verbally inspired, then adulteration (mixing God's inspired word with error) is a serious matter. The blindness referenced in 2 Corinthians 4:3,4 is the reason the Gospel is "hidden" from the eyes of those who are lost. Blindness is a characteristic of the reader, not the Scripture. God's Word is pure, clear, straightforward, meaningful, and understandable and it is communicated and transmitted to us in written form. Believing it causes salvation. Studying it causes growth, maturity and discernment.

Therefore, 2 Corinthians 3:5,6 does not warn against scholarly, dedicated Bible study. It warns against the futility of trying to be people of God while living unconverted lives, devoid of the Spirit. The unconverted and unbelieving can only gain spiritual life by turning to the Lord as commanded in Scripture. If Jesus the Messiah is continually rejected, the letter of Scripture cannot give life. It "kills" in the sense of making one's sin more serious and guilt more pronounced. "But the one who did not know it [the master's will], and committed deeds worthy of a flogging, will receive but few. And from everyone who has been given much shall much be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more" (Luke 12:48). Only in this sense does the letter kill. Paul said in 2 Corinthians 3:5,6 that his apostolic adequacy was from God, of the Spirit and not the letter. Paul was well versed in the letter of Scripture before his conversion. Only when he was apprehended by Messiah did he come into the life of the Spirit. Having done so he did not abandon his high view of Scripture nor his constant use of it.

Another chapter Scripture that receives much employment as a means to discourage the saints from Biblical scholarship is 1 Corinthians 2. "And my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, that your faith should not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God" (1 Corinthians 2:4,5). Some modern preachers assert that this passage shows that Paul rejected Biblical scholarship in favor of doing signs. They say that Paul failed so miserably in Athens on Mars hill where he used reason (Christian apologetics) that he then came to Corinth and abandoned that approach in favor of supernatural power displays.

However, the book of Acts disproves this contention. Acts 17 contains the record of Paul's ministry in Athens.

"Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was being provoked within him as he was beholding the city full of idols. So he was reasoning in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and in the market place every day with those who happened to be present. And also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him. And some were saying, `What would this idle babbler wish to say?' Others, `He seems to be a pro-claimer of strange deities,'-- because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection" (Acts 17:16-18). Paul's message in Athens was "Jesus and the resurrection." It was his assertion that ". . .He [God] has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead." That caused many Athenian philosophers to mock and reject his message.
Did this rejection cause Paul to alter his approach when he came to Corinth? "After these things he left Athens and went to Corinth. . . And he was reasoning in the synagogue every Sabbath and trying to persuade Jews and Greeks. But when Silas and Timothy came down from Macedonia, Paul began devoting himself completely to the word, solemnly testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ" (Acts 18:1,4,5). Paul preached the same message in Corinth that he did in Athens, though using a different format for the synagogue than he did on Mars hill. "And he settled there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them" (Acts 18:11). It is hard to see how preachers can come up with the theory that Paul abandoned reasoned Bible teaching in favor of a "signs and wonders" approach when he came to Corinth. The book of Acts shows just the opposite. He spent many months there teaching them the word of God.



God's Power Changes Lives

The error in the thinking of those who take various passages of 1 Corinthians 2 to be a argument against scholarly Bible study is to equate "persuasive words of wisdom" (verse 4) with Bible teaching and "demonstration of the Spirit and of power" with unusual supernatural occurrences. Earlier in this epistle Paul shows what he means by "power" in this context. "For the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God" (1 Corinthians 1:18).

The power of God transforms lives through the message of the crucified Messiah, though this message is mocked and considered foolish by those with worldly "wisdom." Paul even contrasts the power of the cross with signs and wonders, showing the these are not what he means by power in 1Corinthians: "For indeed Jews ask for signs, and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness, but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God" (1 Corinthians 1:22-24).

Clearly Paul's message and method was the preaching of the cross. To take 1 Corinthians 2 and divorce it from what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 1 is misuse of Scripture. The "words of wisdom" Paul shunned were Greek philosophies that lack the power to change anyone's life. He was not warning against Bible study. The Scriptures contain the wisdom of God, not the false "wisdom" of the world.

Other verses in 1 Corinthians 2 seem to lend support to those who think that sound hermeneutics and reasoned study of Scripture are grievous to the Holy Spirit and likely to produce spiritual death.

"Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words. But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised" (1 Corinthians 2:12-14).

It is supposed that "words taught by the Spirit" is a reference to personal revelations or those of modern day prophets. "Words taught by human wisdom" are taken to be Biblical teachings that take seriously the author's intended meaning. The contrast would then be between Biblical scholarship and spiritual revelation.

A major problem with this interpretation is that it ignores the fact that nowhere in the context is Paul warning Christians against Bible study. The "natural man" has the spirit of the world and not the Spirit of God. That is what makes him spiritually dead. A person who has repented, confessed Christ as Lord, received the gift of the Holy Spirit, and has the assurance of eternal life is not the natural man, devoid of the Spirit, unwilling to accept the things of the Spirit of God just because he seeks those things in God's Word rather than through personal revelation.

The natural man who rejects the things of God is typified by the Athenian philosophers who heard of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, rejected this truth, and mocked Paul's message. As in 2 Corinthians 3, the issues are faith, repentance, conversion, and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. If these are absent, the mere hearing of the message preached or reading it in Scripture will not bring the spiritual life of God. In fact, those who reject Messiah will not listen long to His message nor long search the Scriptures for the truth that sanctifies (John 17:17).

There is nothing incompatible about Paul's teaching that one needs the Holy Spirit to have Godly wisdom and discernment ("the mind of Christ," 1 Corinthians 2:16) and the study of the Scriptures that the Holy Spirit inspired. Also, these passages do not require that the Holy Spirit's inspiration of Scripture and presence in the lives of Christians who study Scripture mean that the words of Scripture have hidden or secret meanings, or meanings that are incomprehensible through the normal study of language. The natural man's rejection of Paul's message was not due to an inability to understand what it means for there to be one God who created the universe, coming judgment by that God, and a man who was resurrected from the dead.

That the Athenians, for example, understood what Paul meant is shown by the fact that some rejected and some accepted his message (Acts 17:32-34). Therefore, I take Paul's use of "understood" (1 Corinthians 2:8,14) not to mean a complete inability to comprehend the meaning of the words he preached, but rather an inability to appreciate the wisdom of God revealed through the Gospel of the crucified Messiah. After all, Paul told the Athenians that God would no longer overlook ignorance about this matter because God had furnished proof to all through the resurrection of Christ (Acts 17:30,31). This means that sufficient evidence had been presented to make them liable for their response. They never "understood" God's wisdom about this not because the word "resurrection" could not be deciphered, but because they considered the idea of God Incarnate, crucified and raised from the dead to be beneath their worldly sophistication. Never mind that they had no problem with pagan superstition, polytheism, dumb idols crafted by men's hands, and many other irrationalities. There is a moral problem at work here, not particularly an intellectual one. Their hand crafted, dumb idols never rebuked their worshiper's immorality like God does when he speaks to men.



God Speaks to us in Words

Nothing in 1 Corinthian 1 & 2 justifies the modern practice of effectively muting God's Word to men's ears by claiming that it is secret, incomprehensible, changeable, full of multiple contradictory meanings, and accessible only by mystical impressions in the mind of man. What a horrible thing to do to the only changeless, authoritative, and eternal moral guidance that has ever been given. This modern approach results in every man doing what is right in his own eyes and claiming revelation from the Spirit of God as justification.

In the same epistle, Paul wrote, "Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively applied to myself and Apollos for your sakes, that in us you might learn not to exceed what is written, in order that no one of you might become arrogant in behalf of one against the other" (1 Corinthians 4:6). Evidently written words can convey a message that sets a standard, creating a boundary to actions and beliefs. If so, anyone saying "the Spirit told me" is not free to teach or practice whatever he pleases.

In the same chapter Paul wrote two other verses that are used by those who would push Biblical scholarship out of the church to be replaced by displays of signs and wonders. "But I will come to you soon, if the Lord wills, and I shall find out, not the words of those who are arrogant, but their power. For the kingdom of God does not consist in words, but in power (1 Corinthians 4:19,20). It is supposed that this means that words are not capable of conveying God's meaning and purpose. It is asserted that the message of Christ crucified if not accompanied by signs and wonders is a defective, truncated gospel. Again, this interpretation puts Paul at odds with himself in 1 Corinthians 1:16-24 where he says just the opposite. The Jews seek supernatural signs, yet the message of Christ crucified is the power of God for the salvation of those who believe.

The power lacking in the "words" of Paul's opponents was the power of God to change lives through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Words can convey lies and falsehoods as well as truth. The lives of those who believe the pleasant sounding words of the false preachers show the powerlessness of their message. Only the gospel is the power of God that can change people eternally. "For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek" (Romans 1:16).

Also consider the following verses: "For our gospel did not come to you in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction; just as you know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. You also became imitators of us and of the Lord, having received the word in much tribulation with the joy of the Holy Spirit, so that you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia (1 Thessalonians 1:5-7). The power of the Holy spirit was shown by the lives of the apostles ("what kind of men we proved to be") and the lives of the Thessalonian believers ("you became an example to all the believers"). Again Paul used the word "power" in connection with the preaching of the gospel to denote changed lives through the indwelling Spirit of God. In none of these cases are supernatural signs directly referenced, though in the book of Acts they did often accompany the preaching of the gospel.

The attacks based on 1Corinthians 1 & 2 against the scholarly study of Scripture and the ability of the words of Scripture to convey God's unchangeable truth to man are seriously in error. By convoluting Paul's message, ignoring the context in 1Corinthians, and failing to consult the passages in Acts 17 and 18 that clarify Paul's meaning, they do mischief to the important message of 1Corinthians 2. By importing meanings into Scriptures and then asserting that meanings cannot be confidently understood from Scripture they also do harm to basic rationality. One just as well read supermarket tabloids to find words from God if this process becomes the norm. The alter- native is to seek the meaning intended by the author as conveyed by the words used (under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit) to share that meaning with his readers.

The Holy Spirit's presence in the lives of believers shows that the power of God has been manifested through the "foolishness" of the message of the crucified Messiah. The Holy Spirit who inspired the Scriptures is not inspiring people to warn against their study or discourage the saints in seeking to understand their meaning. The Spirit of truth (John 14:17) by whom we are regenerated is also at work in our sanctification. The words of Christ, recorded in the Bible, will change us as they are understood, believed and obeyed. Jesus said, "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life" (John 6:63).

http://cicministry.org/commentary/issue16.htm

iSong6:3
May 12th, 2008, 10:33 AM
Two more excellent articles by Bob DeWaay! :thumb

We need to spur each other on to growing up in God. It's such a danger in our culture to just *take* salvation and to sit back and think, all fat and happy like a babe, that *all is well with me now*.

The truth is, we have entered a war and we need to mature in Him, both as worship and out of love for Him and seeking His face, and also to be able to fight our new enemy who seeks to disable us in our lives, for His glory.