PDA

View Full Version : Federal Reserve News


Pages : [1] 2 3 4

Rondaben
June 13th, 2008, 11:59 AM
Hey all...here is a rather frightening update on economic conditions.

The Fed Reservere published the "Aggregate Reserves of Depository Institutions and the Monetary Base" report for June 4 Yesterday. it is Located HERE (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h3/Current/)if you want to see it.

Bottom Line: The state of the Banks is getting much, much worse. Banks are required to hold a reserve of money to pay customers on demand deposits (You go withdraw cash) and to conduct business. The vast majority of bank assets are tied up into loans, derivatives and other relatively illiquid products. The amount is determined as a percentage of their total assets and the types of those assets. Reserve is to be held either as Vault Cash (cash in the bank) or within the Federal Reserve "holding".

For June 4, the reserve that was required was $46 Billion. Lets take a closer look at that number....it works out to $153 for every man woman and child in the US. Forget how much money you think you have in your checking, savings, money market, etc. The bank only has $153 of that on hand. The idea is that not everyone will come at once looking to withdraw thier money and that the reserve amount will be sufficient. Big problem.

Now, look at the next column. Of that $46 Billion, how much is "non-borrowed"? You have to think backwards on this one. It is basically, how much money did the banks have to borrow to have that $46 Billion on hand? The answer: $130 Billion. They had to borrow, from the Fed primarilly, $434 dollars to keep $153 on hand. HUGE, HUGE flag.

How fast is that borrowing increasing? Banks had NO borrowed reserves in December of Last Year. May 7th they had only borrowed 85 billion. In one month they have borrowed an additional 45 Billion JUST TO MEET RESERVES.

Now lets look at all the auction facilities. These were created to help banks and brokerages deal with the amount of bad debt they had related to mortgages and derivative bets that were going south. The idea was that they would "swap" Treasury notes held by Fed for thier bad bonds--essentially the government taking on the bad debt and replacing it with good debt. It was supposed to slow down the amount of losses that banks were incurring--to stop the hemorrhaging that is apparent in the amount of money they have had to borrow simply to meet the reserve requirement.

Since they have been started, banks/brokers have conducted $150 Billion dollars worth of these "swaps" through the Term Auction Facilitiy. It is not shown on this chart, but elsewhere it comes to a total of around $440 Billion. When this mess started the Fed had around $880 Billion worth of treasuries as its "gunpowder" to deal with crises. It took 80 years to accumulate that. Half has been used in the last 6 MONTHS. Every week, the Fed "auctions" off these Treasuries to the banks and brokers to swap. The amount at Auction is currently $75 Billion weekly. At the current consumption rate, that works to somewhere between 6 and 12 weeks of Fed Reserves left.

Now...new issue...the dollar. Some of you may have been seeing the dollar strenghen this week. It is because Treasury and the Fed have been talking about possibly intervening to support it. That means raising interest rates again. Why now?

My thought is that foreign central banks have threatened the Fed over the weak dollar. So much dollar denominated debt is held that they can't let it fall more than it has already and have sent an ultimatum to Bernanke than the US Govt. that if they don't support the dollar, the central banks will dump it. The first step in defending the currency is jawboning. Actions speak louder than words, however, and they will be forced to increase interest rates sooner rather than later.

So, what does all of this mean? The Fed is in a very, very, very difficult place. They are recieving incredible pressure to raise rates from foreign banks and from the obvious inflation going on. If they do this, the banks will literally implode and the housing market will REALLY nosedive from higher rates--and the Fed has already used half of its ability to intervene to prevent the collapse. Stand pat or cut rates to help banks and the consumer and you get a rush from the dollar and massive domestic inflation that will crush the economy and consumer alike as well as spur inflation around the globe.

Jubilee21
June 13th, 2008, 12:20 PM
Very thought provoking observations..thank you for sharing!

jds6958
June 13th, 2008, 12:50 PM
So, what does all of this mean? The Fed is in a very, very, very difficult place. They are receiving incredible pressure to raise rates from foreign banks and from the obvious inflation going on. If they do this, the banks will literally implode and the housing market will REALLY nosedive from higher rates--and the Fed has already used half of its ability to intervene to prevent the collapse. Stand pat or cut rates to help banks and the consumer and you get a rush from the dollar and massive domestic inflation that will crush the economy and consumer alike as well as spur inflation around the globe.

Since August I have also labeled this a catch 22 situation for the economy. The Fed has done a great job of painting one wall for a bit, painting the other side of the wall for a bit, and so on and so on, keeping the majority confused and in check, but the corner is near and they have painted themselves right into it as expected. Now they are just pretending to paint (using lies/jawboning) b/c they are nearly out of paint (resources) and basically saying "what corner?"

So it appears we are getting close to the point where the Fed has to make the decision.

(A) Work towards a stronger dolar but usher in the "Greater Depression" by causing a systematic lockup of the global financial system by means of collapsed bubbles (derivatives, housing, equity markets, etc.) generating unbelievable deflation with nearly everything financial breaking and failing. Since credit is really the global currency and b/c it will dry up and cease to exist during the crisis, a deflationary period is not hard to imagine.

(B)...or change the rules in some way, or become more transparent and begin printing/creating money like crazy to fill in the holes from the collapsing bubbles to keep the economy and currency moving but suffer from extreme inflation as a result sucking the "value" out of anything that is a paper asset to pay for the failed artificial money bubbles that have accumulated over decades. Countries will watch in terrified awe as the scramble to decouple from the U.S. exaggerating the impact of the crisis in the U.S. as the epicenter of it all. Since the introduction of our recent global fiat currency age all solutions for any economic crisis have involved currency debasement for any country.

Examining all of the unbiased and non-manipulated indicators, charts, and data, this fall still appears to be the beginning of the collapse phase which could last for a few years (depending on how quickly things progress) to allow for the complete purging of all of the excesses in the system.

I have assumed from the beginning that the Fed will choose option B. I see it as one of two possible extremes from a high level perspective. I am not sure if there is a middle ground way out of this.

What are your thoughts on how it may play out at a high level, ignoring the smaller details?

Rondaben
June 13th, 2008, 01:16 PM
I agree completely with your assessment. I believe that they will choose option B as well. Globalist forces are at hand and it is the only real way to put forth a NAU type accomodation is through hyperinflationary destruction of the currency.

That and historically it is the way every fiat currency has gone.

One other idea that I have had is regarding how that would be pulled off. You can be assured that the Government will not accept any responsibility for it. The scenario I envision is this:

1) Once the Fed's reserves are depleted they will need to decide to either let the crash happen, print cash to distribute to banks directly (too transparent in my opinion) or print money to purchase US treasuries and continue the Term auction "subsidy". I believe they will do the latter.

2) Because this will dramatically increase the rate of inflation such that it cannot be concealed, they will need to be able to "scapegoat" it onto a third party--a fall guy if you will.

3) An attack in the September-October timeframe on Iran fits the bill. Inflation in oil will be blamed on the war and likely Iranian moves to halt oil production/shipment in the Persian Gulf. That masks energy inflation. They can blame food inflation on the price of fuel and poor crop yields.

4) The dollar will begin to plummett. This will be blamed on the war and uncertainty of plunging markets as to what is coming.

In effect, we take out Iran's nuclear capability and blame the war for the economic collapse caused by the Fed. Unfortunately that will start a fire that will be unexpected.

jds6958
June 13th, 2008, 01:29 PM
The scenario I envision is this:

1) Once the Fed's reserves are depleted they will need to decide to either let the crash happen, print cash to distribute to banks directly (too transparent in my opinion) or print money to purchase US treasuries and continue the Term auction "subsidy". I believe they will do the latter.

2) Because this will dramatically increase the rate of inflation such that it cannot be concealed, they will need to be able to "scapegoat" it onto a third party--a fall guy if you will.

3) An attack in the September-October timeframe on Iran fits the bill. Inflation in oil will be blamed on the war and likely Iranian moves to halt oil production/shipment in the Persian Gulf. That masks energy inflation. They can blame food inflation on the price of fuel and poor crop yields.

4) The dollar will begin to plummet. This will be blamed on the war and uncertainty of plunging markets as to what is coming.

In effect, we take out Iran's nuclear capability and blame the war for the economic collapse caused by the Fed. Unfortunately that will start a fire that will be unexpected.

We are exactly on the same page it seems...

I have speculated further wondering if Israel will initiate the action on Iran and we "will have to" become involved. Mostly because of the influence of Sinclair, I believe Pakistan will play a role in this at some point, but further down the time line. Sinclair just seems to know something and I know his family name has connections...

Regardless, just like the Weimer Republic, a scapegoat will be sought if not created. So far it appears we are being conditioned to accept the Iran scenario as you proposed.

As all of this happens, countries swamped in USD's can begin to dump out of fear of the US economic condition...the U.S. can blame the inflation that results on other countries in "economic warfare" while the USD printing machine is humming along in the background trying to bandage the extreme bleeding of the financial meltdown.

I suspect plans are already made to help us arrive the eventual conclusion once they are ready for stability. The solution may be the NAU as step one, however, if the crisis is big enough, they may be able to avoid step one and proceed direction to step 2 or 3 with a more globalized approach. I am starting to see that conditioning appear as well in MSM for the first time.

Interesting times...thanks again for your thoughts...

Glory
June 13th, 2008, 01:50 PM
Wow. That's all I can say. Wow. So you two are in agreement here with how you believe it will go. jds also mentioned on his thread about the "scape goat" theory. If you're right Rondaben, that attack on Iran would be just before elections.

By the way, Rosh Hashana begins at sundown on September 30. :thinking

HisAlways
June 13th, 2008, 02:00 PM
I'm sorry, but I am really ignorant when it comes to economics.

Should I withdraw my savings from my credit union? Is that what you are saying?

child of the King
June 13th, 2008, 02:14 PM
May I jump into these thoughts with some questions? I viewed the Youtube material showing Larry Williams saying the the US is over a barrel (so to speak). The so-called oil shortage would not have to exist but it does because the US government, represented by Henry Kissinger, made agreements with oil nations to buy their oil with our dollars. Therefore, the oil currency is the dollar. These nations, in effect, are carrying our debt by taking our dollars. If the oil currency is changed to the Euro, our economy would plunge. Iran could make that happen so the US will probably not be the aggressor to Iran. This is what I gleaned from the Larry Williams video. Meanwhile, according to Williams, we are sitting on two oil fields in the ANWR that would provide oil for the US for 200 years but the government will not allow us to use it because we would no longer need to buy oil and then our debt would be called. Our economy appears to be ready to plunge over the edge and as the posts in this forum are suggesting, the slide is coming. Now, if I may stretch this one bit further, there was a post yesterday concerning oil in Israel. If that is correct, then we have the scenerio that we expect. The ME goes against Israel for their oil (in addition to the hate for Israel), the US holds back against helping Israel. Either way, the US is no longer a player but will be reaping the wrath of God for the abominations against His name that we have allowed. Would either of these things seem possible?

Rondaben
June 13th, 2008, 02:19 PM
I'm sorry, but I am really ignorant when it comes to economics.

Should I withdraw my savings from my credit union? Is that what you are saying?

I'd be diversifying away from the dollar into food, silver/gold that you physically hold.

One way to think of it is like this. You put $1000 into savings at your CU in 2000. You could buy $1000 worth of product at 2000 prices.

Today that $1000 would buy around $750 worth of products. The dollar's value has fallen that much so it takes more of them to buy the same amount.

Had you bought $1000 worth of Gold in 2000 you would today be able to buy almost $2300 dollars worth of products. Gold held it's buying power and more over the time the dollar weakened.

The events we have discussed are extremely anti-dollar. When inflation--or hyperinflation hits---the dollar will become worthless relative to the price of commodities such as food. Then is when gold/silver will hold value and can be traded for those commodities.

Worse case? We are full of hot air. Economy explodes. If that happens, sell your gold/silver and pocket the cash.

BeNotAfraid
June 13th, 2008, 02:36 PM
May I jump into these thoughts with some questions? I viewed the Youtube material showing Larry Williams saying the the US is over a barrel (so to speak). The so-called oil shortage would not have to exist but it does because the US government, represented by Henry Kissinger, made agreements with oil nations to buy their oil with our dollars. Therefore, the oil currency is the dollar. These nations, in effect, are carrying our debt by taking our dollars. If the oil currency is changed to the Euro, our economy would plunge. Iran could make that happen so the US will probably not be the aggressor to Iran. This is what I gleaned from the Larry Williams video. Meanwhile, according to Williams, we are sitting on two oil fields in the ANWR that would provide oil for the US for 200 years but the government will not allow us to use it because we would no longer need to buy oil and then our debt would be called. Our economy appears to be ready to plunge over the edge and as the posts in this forum are suggesting, the slide is coming. Now, if I may stretch this one bit further, there was a post yesterday concerning oil in Israel. If that is correct, then we have the scenerio that we expect. The ME goes against Israel for their oil (in addition to the hate for Israel), the US holds back against helping Israel. Either way, the US is no longer a player but will be reaping the wrath of God for the abominations against His name that we have allowed. Would either of these things seem possible?

That is a very popular theory in many circles. It is thought that oil in Israel might be the hook in Gog's mouth that brings them to Ezekial 38-39. However, many knowledgeable scholars maintain that there is absolutely no legitimate indication (so far) that there is indeed oil in Israel.