PDA

View Full Version : Canadian Health Care We So Envy Lies In Ruins, Its Architect Admits


felixthecat
June 27th, 2008, 11:49 PM
Canadian Health Care We So Envy Lies In Ruins, Its Architect Admits

By DAVID GRATZER | Posted Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:30 PM PT

As this presidential campaign continues, the candidates' comments about health care will continue to include stories of their own experiences and anecdotes of people across the country: the uninsured woman in Ohio, the diabetic in Detroit, the overworked doctor in Orlando, to name a few.

...

But no one will mention Claude Castonguay — perhaps not surprising because this statesman isn't an American and hasn't held office in over three decades.

...

Back in the 1960s, Castonguay chaired a Canadian government committee studying health reform and recommended that his home province of Quebec — then the largest and most affluent in the country — adopt government-administered health care, covering all citizens through tax levies.

The government followed his advice, leading to his modern-day moniker: "the father of Quebec medicare." Even this title seems modest; Castonguay's work triggered a domino effect across the country, until eventually his ideas were implemented from coast to coast.

Four decades later, as the chairman of a government committee reviewing Quebec health care this year, Castonguay concluded that the system is in "crisis."

"We thought we could resolve the system's problems by rationing services or injecting massive amounts of new money into it," says Castonguay. But now he prescribes a radical overhaul: "We are proposing to give a greater role to the private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice."

...

Sick with ovarian cancer, Sylvia de Vires, an Ontario woman afflicted with a 13-inch, fluid-filled tumor weighing 40 pounds, was unable to get timely care in Canada. She crossed the American border to Pontiac, Mich., where a surgeon removed the tumor, estimating she could not have lived longer than a few weeks more.

...

The problem is that government bureaucrats simply can't centrally plan their way to better health care.

...

Declarations can't solve staffing shortages and the other rationing of care that occurs in government-run systems.

...

However the candidates choose to proceed, Americans should know that one of the founding fathers of Canada's government-run health care system has turned against his own creation. If Claude Castonguay is abandoning ship, why should Americans bother climbing on board? :thinking

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=299282509335931

Issachar
June 28th, 2008, 09:50 AM
There are a couple of good discussions on this in the Citizen's Central forum that involves a couple of very cordial Canadian's. :)

The federal government is "of the world". Socialized anything is "of the world". So called "private" insurance is "of the world". All things "of the world" are messed up. Whenever something at least sort of works, it is only by God's grace and mercy.

Hanging on to what we have in the U.S., healthcare wise, is only good for some. Going to socialized healthcare would be very good for the havenots and not as good for those that have good coverage now. So the debate will go on anytime it is brought up because we all see the issue through the eyes of our experience.

The best view, as believers, imho, is to step back, continue to trust our Lord in whatever circumstance we find ourselves, and pray. If some folks on this board want socialized healthcare, it's because they have none or are close to some that have none. But their wanting it isn't what is going to bring it about. The intense push towards a one world order is what will bring it about. It won't be "for the people"; that is just a side issue. If some folks on this board don't want it and like the insurance system we have in the U.S., it is because that is what is working for them. The fact is though, insurance is merely what I call, a sort of privatized socialism.

Issachar