PDA

View Full Version : Paul Tripp-ing -- Has John Piper lost his mind or just fogotten his Bible?


susanb
September 18th, 2008, 10:59 AM
From CampOnThis (http://stevenjcamp.blogspot.com/2008/09/paul-tripp-ing-likes-to-say-s-word-has.html):

[YOU TUBE VIDEO]YUtPBCELCZc[/YOU TUBE VIDEO]

Paul Tripp has discovered the "s" word. He likes to say it; he giggles like a red-faced school girl when he does; he thinks its cool; he thinks he's cutting edge and culturally relevant; he thinks he's being radical; he thinks he's being profound; he thinks he's being biblical, but yet never quotes one verse of Scripture; and Piper has produced this wasteful intestinal discharge (pun intended) and condones what Tripp is saying. Who has spiked the water in Minnesota?

For those of you who are tired of the shallow Driscoll-influenced scatological speech pulpiteers who like to use four letter words and smutty humor in trying to relate to their audience thinking they are making a profound biblical point, then be prepared to be shocked again. Tripp says the "s" word a lot in this short video clip. I don't have virgin ears and I don't have virgin lips. But remember, this is a man who is a well known Bible teacher whom at this conference will be instructing many other pastors as well from the pulpit on this subject. Has preaching God's Word so degenerated to the lowest common denominator of soiled nomenclature that Tripp's words are now considered acceptable speech in describing the glory and wonder of God? Could you imagine Spurgeon, Owen, Watson, Edwards, Paul, Peter, or the Lord Himself using language of this sort? Totally unnecessary; and totally uncool.


FYI: this is one of the promo videos for Piper's upcoming DG Conference "The Power of Words and the Wonder of God" at the end of September produced by his ministry. They had to put a disclaimer at the front of this video because of its bad language. But even then, Piper is Clintonian in not really owning it calling the "s" word "...potentially offensive, four letter language..." Personally... I'm staying home. I don't need to pay 175 bucks to hear some impolitic not preach faithfully the Scriptures and dance around what "wholesome speech" might mean to them so they can wrest the Word to accommodate their own guttural proclivities and justify the use of the "s" word in ministry. Furthermore, when you invite men like Tripp and Driscoll who obviously have this bent in ministry for smutty speech rather than proven expositors of God's Word like MacArthur, Sproul, Mohler, Duncan, or Begg - then something is amiss; or in this case, a mess. I don't need beloved, an excuse by any Bible teacher to use ribald speech and cuss; I need to be challenged to be more like Jesus Christ and obedient to His Word.

However, the one shining light among this otherwise line up of lightweights will be Dr. Sinclair Ferguson. He is brilliant, biblical and reverent. You can order his MP3's and save yourself some hard earned legal-tender and the embarrassment of seeing a few middle-aged men trying to relate to a pomo culture.

Anyone seen the real John Piper lately? If you do, tell him that he is missed and that we want to hear him just preach the Word again and leave behind his fascination with this high-school, emerging, juvenile, lascivious mentality once for all.



Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths,

but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion,

that it may give grace to those who hear.

-Eph. 4:29

http://stevenjcamp.blogspot.com/2008/09/paul-tripp-ing-likes-to-say-s-word-has.html

Sing4Him
September 18th, 2008, 11:18 AM
:faintI don't even know what to say. :tsk:tsk:tsk

His Bride
September 18th, 2008, 12:42 PM
I guess we shouldn't be surprised when the words in the Bible are no longer considered valuable to the "Church " today. The Bible is now considered irrelevant, too dogmatic, full of expectations to holy and righteous living. If you don't read, you're not expected to follow it, right?:ohno

susanb
September 18th, 2008, 12:55 PM
When I first started reading articles on the internet (about 6 years ago), John Piper seemed to be on level with John MacArthur theologically. I wouldn't say that now though. Piper reminds me of a straight-A student who hangs out with the wrong crowd and flunks school.

Sing4Him
September 18th, 2008, 07:28 PM
MacArthur does not agree with many of Piper's thoughts especially lately.

(ie: contextualization, eschatology, ...)

Actually, they are quite different in their doctrinal stances.

susanb
September 19th, 2008, 12:12 AM
MacArthur does not agree with many of Piper's thoughts especially lately.

(ie: contextualization, eschatology, ...)

Actually, they are quite different in their doctrinal stances.

I didn't think they believed everything the same, but it was my impression that in the past, John Piper was regarded with the same respect as John MacArthur. Now, it's a totally different story. Piper would not be able to defend the truth from scripture as strongly as MacArthur does, as on the Larry King show. Piper seems to have lost some moorings...

As the saying goes "if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas"

His Bride
September 19th, 2008, 08:49 AM
This clip is from the Desiring God conference. Oh I guess that interview will help me to desire God more? What kind of conference was it anyway?