PDA

View Full Version : Obama’s chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

Joe Valentine
November 8th, 2008, 08:19 AM
Obama’s chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service

J.D. Tuccille
Civil Liberties Examiner
Friday, Nov 7, 2008

Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, President-Elect Barack Obama’s choice for chief of staff in his incoming administration, is co-author of a book, The Plan: Big Ideas for America, that calls for, among other things, compulsory service for all Americans ages 18 to 25. The following excerpt is from pages 61-62 of the 2006 book:

"It’s time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service. …

Here’s how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They’ll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we’re hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities’ most pressing needs."

Emanuel and co-author Bruce Reed insist “this is not a draft,” but go on to write of young men and women, “the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service.” They also warn, “[s]ome Republicans will squeal about individual freedom,” ruling out any likelihood that they would let people opt out of universal citizen service.

As chief of staff, Emanuel will not be in a position to directly introduce public policy, but his enthusiasm for compulsory service, combined with Barack Obama’s own plan to require high school students to perform 50 hours of government-approved service, suggest an unfortunate direction for the new administration.

Joe Valentine
November 8th, 2008, 08:21 AM
Funny how disaster-response seems to be the most prominent topic to address in these labor camps, right when the end times are upon us.

kcofohio
November 8th, 2008, 08:45 AM
One has to wonder if this could be used to indoctrinate the young into their liberal, eco-religion ideas. Sort of like Hilter's youth camps. If they can pass legistlation on this, this would be a big step into controlling the youth.

Richland2008
November 8th, 2008, 09:02 AM
I think that is a great idea for the youth that drop out of high school without a diploma. Also the youth who do not want to work. What better way to educate the youth on emergency preparedness. Maybe some of them would find a field of work to go into.

There are so many pros and cons to this. I think the bad outweigh the good.

I also agree with Joe Valentine - Funny how disaster-response seems to be the most prominent topic to address in these labor camps, right when the end times are upon us, as well as kcofohio - One has to wonder if this could be used to indoctrinate the young into their liberal, eco-religion ideas.

Joe Valentine
November 8th, 2008, 09:26 AM
I think that is a great idea for the youth that drop out of high school without a diploma. Also the youth who do not want to work. What better way to educate the youth on emergency preparedness. Maybe some of them would find a field of work to go into.

There are so many pros and cons to this. I think the bad outweigh the good.

I also agree with Joe Valentine - Funny how disaster-response seems to be the most prominent topic to address in these labor camps, right when the end times are upon us, as well as kcofohio - One has to wonder if this could be used to indoctrinate the young into their liberal, eco-religion ideas.

You know, your little copy and paste job sounds really funny when all the replies are read in succession...

queengina66
November 8th, 2008, 09:34 AM
I think that is a great idea for the youth that drop out of high school without a diploma. Also the youth who do not want to work. What better way to educate the youth on emergency preparedness. Maybe some of them would find a field of work to go into.

There are so many pros and cons to this. I think the bad outweigh the good.

I also agree with Joe Valentine - Funny how disaster-response seems to be the most prominent topic to address in these labor camps, right when the end times are upon us, as well as kcofohio - One has to wonder if this could be used to indoctrinate the young into their liberal, eco-religion ideas.

What would they do with children in special ed programs such as developmental delayment, anxiety disorders, mild retardation?

antitox
November 8th, 2008, 09:57 AM
I don't there's going to be anything from the Socialist Administration that I will be happy with at all.

This is too radical. I don't see anything good coming out of Bammy's operations.

logosone
November 8th, 2008, 10:19 AM
The military draft was coming regardless of who got in there. All this other stuff is a page out of Castro's playbook.

Jec
November 8th, 2008, 10:28 AM
All these young people who have voted for BO are going to start to have second thoughts. It looks like it will come back and bite them, like my son who is 18 yrs old. :heh

icebear
November 8th, 2008, 10:35 AM
similar subject here (different source- change.org)
http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=67266