
Originally Posted by
LaMontre
Except that Lukes account is not "parallel"....but rather a completely different account, to a completely different audience that was mixed with disciples, and unbelievers, and in a completely different place.
Luk 21:37 And in the daytime he was teaching in the temple; and at night he went out, and abode in the mount that is called the mount of Olives.
Luk 21:38 And all the people came early in the morning to him in the temple, for to hear him.
Luk 20:1 And it came to pass, that on one of those days, as he taught the people in the temple, and preached the gospel, the chief priests and the scribes came upon him with the elders,
Luk 20:2 And spake unto him, saying, Tell us, by what authority doest thou these things? or who is he that gave thee this authority?
Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to show him the buildings of the temple.
Mat 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
As you can see, they are totally different.
But in this case you are correct, Jesus does indeed address 70AD in the Luke account, because that is what he was asked about. Whereas in the Olivette discourse, to his disciples, to whom he taught plainly, and who understood that he was going to have a "second coming", he gave a much more detailed account of the 70th week. It is not until vs. 25 of the Temple discourse that he even begins to cover the events of the 70th week, and that only briefly.
There is a reason for this:
Mat 13:34 All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:
Luk 8:10 And he said, Unto you (the disciples) it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Anytime Jesus taught kingdom principles, he taught in parables, unless he was speaking privately to his disciples, as he was in Mat 24.
So we know that this is a warning about 70AD:
Luk 21:17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake.
Luk 21:18 But there shall not a hair of your head perish.
Why not?
Because whoever would heed his words would escape the seige, as I am sure you can confirm, jikoklol.
Luk 21:19 In your patience possess ye your souls.
Luk 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
The desolation of Jerusalem, not the temple.
Luk 21:21 Then let them which are in Judea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.
Luk 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
Luk 21:23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
Luk 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
Who would fall by the sword?? He just said not a hair of your head would perrish. Obviously it is unbelievers who would die. Only believers, (Christians, the Church) would wisely heed the words of Jesus, and live through the 70AD onslaught.
Only then does he move on to more distant future events, and briefly warns about His second coming.