There are two ways the word "church" is used. Here is one of them (for example):
Acts 7:38 -
"This is he, that was
in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him
in the mount Sina, and [with] our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us"
Are we going to claim that "the
church [that was] in the wilderness" (back when the commandments were given at Sina[i]) is the same as "the Church which is His body" now? Those who hold to Covenant Theology/Reformed Theology certainly do.
Also, some make the case: that some of the Church (any member of the body of Christ) may go through the tribulation period (if they are, so-called, "Lukewarm" [according to their faulty definition of it]... but the lukewarm verse is not referring to "the Church" which is His body, but [are letters] to "the church
es" made up of both believers and those who are NOT connected to the Source [i.e. unbelievers]).
I just think we need to be careful... just because a verse uses the word
"church" does not mean it is referring to the Church which is His body (and to which the rapture pertains).
