Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 61

Thread: Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,549

    Default Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...alth-care-law/


    President Obama, employing his strongest language to date on the Supreme Court review of the federal health care overhaul, cautioned the court Monday against overturning the law -- while repeatedly saying he's "confident" it will be upheld.

    The president spoke at length about the case at a joint press conference with the leaders of Mexico and Canada. The president, adopting what he described as the language of conservatives who fret about judicial activism, questioned how an "unelected group of people" could overturn a law approved by Congress.
    PARTIAL OBEDIENCE IS STILL REBELLION

    Please pray for my daughter's salvation, Thank you.

    Anno Domini

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The land of Dautches, Buhgies, Faschnachts, and Wilbur Dark Chocolate
    Posts
    17,064

    Default

    How?

    By the opposite way judges legislate from the bench, and unqualified comunists destroy our nation;

    by the authority of the Constitution.
    It's ALL about Jesus. The Son of God - Emanuel - The Mighty God - Our Salvation.

    John 1:1-3 NKJV --- Luke 22:42 NKJV --Romans 3:23 NKJV, Rom 5:8 NKJV, Rom 8:28 NKJV, Rom 8:31 NKJV, Rom8:38-39 NKJV, ---Titus 1:2 NKJV - Heb 6:18 NKJV --- John 14:6 NKJV --- 1 John 5:13 NKJV --- Acts 16:29-31 NKJV ... John 6:28-29 NKJV... 1John 2:22 NKJV... Heb 10:11-13 NKJV

    “Oh Look,... an Atheist........I Don't believe it....”

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New Jerusalem
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    He sounds intimidating

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,627

    Default

    Amendment to the Constitution . I
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
    the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,
    or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government
    for a redress of greivances."
    I think this comes under petitioning the government for a redress of greivances.
    Baruch atah Adonai Eloheinu melech haolam --Blessed are you O Lord our God, King of the universe

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,549

    Default

    Prayer warriors needed!
    PARTIAL OBEDIENCE IS STILL REBELLION

    Please pray for my daughter's salvation, Thank you.

    Anno Domini

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New Jerusalem
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    Mexico just had an earthquake.... Bama must be up to something...

  7. #7

    Default

    Probably the last thing a President wants to do is intimidate or threaten the Justices with their "eloquent words" , I think he'll get the opposite ruling he wants. Pretty simple. The more he seems to squirm about it, the more I laugh about it.
    Don't panic! Just be Rapture Ready.

    Joel 3:2

    I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will put them on trial for what they did to my inheritance, my people Israel, because they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,449

    Tsk tsk

    Remember when Dr. Kervorkian was on trial, and he gave the summary, rather than the attorney? Looks like Barry may be making the same mistake. Who is he to tell the Supreme Court what to do!??!?!?!? If Barry is such an expert on the Constitution, hasn't he heard of the 'Separation of Powers'???? They're not there for him, but for the People of the United States of America. Barry's actions are piling up. Remember in November!!!!!!
    There's nothing our LORD JESUS CHRIST can't do!!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,449

    Yay!

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy S. View Post
    Prayer warriors needed!
    Amen!!!
    There's nothing our LORD JESUS CHRIST can't do!!!!

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HeIsEnough View Post
    Probably the last thing a President wants to do is intimidate or threaten the Justices with their "eloquent words" , I think he'll get the opposite ruling he wants. Pretty simple. The more he seems to squirm about it, the more I laugh about it.
    And yet, if he does end up getting the ruling he wants, I'm sure he'll extol the Supremes' virtues to the skies. I, however, somehow suspect you are correct and that he will come away with, at least, less of the law than the whole, and perhaps none at all.
    "Oir is leatsa an rioghachd, agus an cumhachd, agus a gloir, gu siorraidh, Amen." ("For Thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever, Amen" -- Scots Gaelic)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    northern ohio
    Posts
    1,806

    Default

    And if they were leaning toward giving him what he wants they would be the next best thing to sliced bread. The guy will probably try to bully them more. Amazing how this guy does not understand the protocol of being president.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    2,542

    Default

    I am sooooo tired of his arrogance. "King" and "president" are not equivalent offices. He seems to have the titles confused.


    Take one and pass it on!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,818

    Default

    This is not the first time O has publicly hectored the Supreme Court. Remember the State of the Union speech in 2010? The Emperor didn't like it that the Court had allowed corporations to contribute to political campaigns. While the Court sat in the front row, he chastised them on every channel.

    Things to remember in November:

    1) The above
    2) The current jawboning of the Court
    3) SOLYNDRA (an Obama-financed corporation)
    4) Cross covering prior to the Emperor's royal appearances
    5) An Energy Secretary that wanted gas prices to rise to European levels
    6) Czars
    7) Panic-driven mega-bailouts of organizations deemed "too big to fail"
    8) Bowing to the Saudi King
    9) Apologizing to Islam
    10) Fast and Furious (automatic weapons to Mexico to "catch" drug dealers)
    11) Failure to secure the Mexican border
    12) Pandering to illegal immigration for votes
    13) The Green Religion/Global Warming Mythology
    14) Plunging the country into unpayable debt
    15) Bullying Israel (last but definitely not least)

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    410

    Default

    I don't get it.

    If what he says is true...

    Why have a supreme court at all?

    Just because congress passes something and the president signs it doesn't make it legal.
    I accept nothing from man as truth...
    only that, One is the truth. (John 14-6)

    Pre-Flood/Pre-Trib (Genesis 5-24)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pistos View Post
    I don't get it.

    If what he says is true...

    Why have a supreme court at all?

    Just because congress passes something and the president signs it doesn't make it legal.
    It does when you are arrogant enough to believe you are above the Constitution, as Obama has indicated time and time again over the past 3 years.
    "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment." (Matthew 22:37-38)

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    138

    Default

    #16 - Supporting the Arab Spring protesters over Mubarak, who had kept the peace with Israel, of which looks to be in serious jeopardy.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Some of the "elected" idiots who voted for this unconstitutional communist mandate openly admitted to not having read the document before voting for it.

    How could such idiocy even be considered valid just because they were "elected".

    I hope it gets struck down completely.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    138

    Default

    I've noticed the Dems, particularly Howard Dean in his interview with FOX's Chris Wallace on Sunday, are now saying (spinning) the striking down of the individual mandate would be a good thing for Obama, acknowledging that the majority of America's are against it.

    This whole thing was never about health care. It's just another way for the gov't to dip their hands into your pocket.

    I have a plan at work where I have a certain amount each year deducted from my paycheck to go into a healthcare spending account. I can pay for prescriptions and doctor visit co-pays using a Visa card directly tied to that account. Best of all, the money deducted is from pre-tax dollars, meaning I'm taxed less on the remainder that gets deposited into my bank account.

    I haven't heard if this individual mandate can be paid for using pre-tax dollars. Anyone know anything about that?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dixie
    Posts
    61

    Default

    If the sc strikes down the mandate clause then the whole law is gone.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,782

    Default

    Drudge has the headline "Did He Get a Leak" under a pic of him and Elena Kagan smiling at eachother. I wonder what the odds are that he already knows how the supreme court has voted? But, as I understand it they could still change their vote before the rest of the world knows the results.

    I don't understand what planet some of the dems are on if they honestly believe that the SC striking down the law would help Obama win re-election? How could that possibly happen? Unless he would try to play the victim card by saying that the evil conservative justices shot it down to go against him personally. Oh, and that they're all racist and it's about going against a black man.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •